Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...
Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...
Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
communication campaign evaluation in recent years <strong>and</strong> what choices evalua<strong>to</strong>rs<br />
have been making in terms of their evaluation designs <strong>and</strong> methods. Offers a<br />
discussion of how campaign evaluations have taken place in practice <strong>and</strong> the<br />
challenges that exist. It provides examples of campaign evaluations, including a<br />
number related <strong>to</strong> violence-prevention.<br />
� Lessons in Evaluating Communications <strong>Campaigns</strong>: Five Case Studies,<br />
Communications Consortium Media Center/ Harvard Family Research Project,<br />
2003.<br />
EVALUATING ADVOCACY CAMPAIGNS: ASSESSING POLICY CHANGE<br />
Success or failure of campaigns aiming for clearly circumscribed institutional change,<br />
e.g. the adoption of a specific law on ending VAW, can be determined quite easily, by<br />
verifying whether change has taken place, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> what extent. E.g. if the campaign goal<br />
is the creation of a new law <strong>against</strong> VAW, has such a law been passed, <strong>and</strong> does it<br />
include all the provisions the campaign has advocated for? Did the campaign’s<br />
outcomes contribute directly (or indirectly) <strong>to</strong> the passing of the new law?<br />
However, it’s important <strong>to</strong> note that answering the question of goal attainment alone<br />
does not yield sufficient lessons on the effectiveness of individual campaign activities.<br />
To gain learning for future campaigns, it is therefore important <strong>to</strong> also examine the<br />
campaign progress <strong>and</strong> outcomes more closely, using indica<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>and</strong> specifying<br />
rigorously who changed what, when <strong>and</strong> where, in verifiable detail.<br />
The effect of the campaign on its primary targets (e.g. political decision-makers) can be<br />
gauged by reviewing campaign documentation <strong>and</strong> interviewing relevant<br />
stakeholders. Tools for evaluating mass communication can be applied <strong>to</strong> those<br />
aspects of institutional change campaigns that aim <strong>to</strong> build public support for an issue,<br />
usually among secondary target audiences.<br />
TOOLS:<br />
The following resources provide guidance on how <strong>to</strong> evaluate advocacy projects, <strong>and</strong><br />
can also be applied <strong>to</strong> advocacy campaigns:<br />
� Tracking Progress in Advocacy: Why <strong>and</strong> How <strong>to</strong> Moni<strong>to</strong>r <strong>and</strong> Evaluate Advocacy<br />
Projects <strong>and</strong> Programmes (O’Flynn, M., INTRAC, 2009). This paper introduces<br />
the scope of, <strong>and</strong> rationale for, engaging in advocacy work as part of<br />
development interventions. It then focuses on the issue of moni<strong>to</strong>ring <strong>and</strong><br />
evaluating these efforts - offering reasons why <strong>and</strong> when these processes should<br />
be planned <strong>and</strong> implemented, describing what is involved (including challenges<br />
<strong>and</strong> opportunities), <strong>and</strong> detailing who should be engaged in the process.<br />
� A User's Guide <strong>to</strong> Advocacy Evaluation Planning (Harvard Family Research<br />
Project, 2009). This <strong>to</strong>ol takes the reader through four basic steps that generate<br />
the core elements of an advocacy evaluation plan, including what will be<br />
measured <strong>and</strong> how.<br />
� Pathfinder: A Practical Guide <strong>to</strong> Advocacy Evaluation (Innovation Network, 2009).<br />
This guide is intended as an introduction <strong>to</strong> advocacy evaluation from an<br />
evalua<strong>to</strong>r's perspective. It is written <strong>to</strong> give a sense of what is involved in the<br />
process <strong>and</strong> how this kind of evaluation differs from programme evaluations. The<br />
289<br />
<strong>Campaigns</strong> December 2011