26.12.2012 Views

Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...

Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...

Campaigns to End Violence against Women and Girls - Virtual ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.5 RISK ANALYSIS<br />

Unlike SWOT <strong>and</strong> PESTEL analysis, risk analysis does not only examine the present<br />

situation, but asks the question “what might go wrong?” It examines the likelihood of<br />

new problems surfacing, or existing threats <strong>and</strong> weaknesses worsening, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

potential impact of this on the campaign. Risk analysis is needed <strong>to</strong> plan for<br />

emergencies <strong>and</strong> contingencies.<br />

More specifically, risk analysis examines:<br />

- External threats that may affect the target audience generally or in relation <strong>to</strong> the<br />

campaign, e.g. a rise in conservative religious sentiment or likely armed conflict<br />

- External threats that may affect the campaign activities, e.g. a law might be adopted<br />

that limits NGO activism, change in government or policy or a new education policy<br />

may make access <strong>to</strong> schools more difficult<br />

- Internal threats that may affect the capacity <strong>to</strong> run the campaign, e.g. an alliance<br />

member might leave, or key campaigners might no longer be available for the<br />

campaign<br />

Risk analysis does not focus on existing weaknesses, such as lack of funding. It<br />

anticipates future problems – e.g. the possible lack of donor response <strong>to</strong> your<br />

fundraising strategy.<br />

Practical Instructions for Risk Analysis<br />

Use or adapt the template below. For each risk identified, consider how likely the risk is<br />

<strong>and</strong> how serious the consequences would be if it were <strong>to</strong> materialize. Scoring<br />

determines which risks deserve particular attention. In the example below, scoring from<br />

1 <strong>to</strong> 10 is used; alternatively you can use a simpler system with just three scores (“high<br />

– medium – low”).<br />

Risk Probability<br />

1.<br />

(1 – very unlikely;<br />

10 – highly likely<br />

Impact<br />

(1 – insignificant;<br />

10 – very<br />

serious)<br />

How <strong>to</strong> minimize or<br />

mitigate the risk?<br />

60<br />

<strong>Campaigns</strong> December 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!