20.01.2013 Views

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 34: Access to Clean <strong>and</strong> Safe Water Supply 50<br />

% of households us<strong>in</strong>g an improved<br />

source as ma<strong>in</strong> source of dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water<br />

100<br />

75<br />

50<br />

25<br />

0<br />

1990<br />

1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025<br />

Rural - Rout<strong>in</strong>e data<br />

Rural - Survey data<br />

Rural - WSDP Targets<br />

Rural - MKUKUTA/MDG/V2025<br />

Target<br />

Urban - Rout<strong>in</strong>e<br />

Urban - Survey<br />

Urban - WSDP Targets<br />

Urban - MKUKUTA/MDG/V2025 Targets<br />

CLUSTER II- GOAL 3<br />

Sources of data: M<strong>in</strong>istry of Water, rout<strong>in</strong>e data; HBS 1991-92, 2000/01 <strong>and</strong> 2007; Population <strong>and</strong> Hous<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Census 2002 (NBS, 2003); TDHS 2004/05.<br />

In rural areas, survey data suggest little or no <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> coverage over the past seven years. In<br />

urban areas, survey data show a decl<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g trend, particularly <strong>in</strong> piped water supply (Figure 35).<br />

This likely reflects the failure of network expansion <strong>and</strong> service delivery to keep pace with urban<br />

population growth. Based on these estimates, neither rural nor urban coverage targets under<br />

MKUKUTA will be met. However, the gaps between current coverage <strong>and</strong> the MKUKUTA targets,<br />

especially for rural areas, are exaggerated as targets were set based on rout<strong>in</strong>e data estimates<br />

which give consistently higher estimates of access than do survey data.<br />

50 Prior to 2008, even MoWI data excluded Dar es Salaam. MoWI coverage estimates <strong>in</strong> Dar es Salaam are<br />

significantly lower than <strong>in</strong> other urban areas (68% compared to 83%), which expla<strong>in</strong>s the dip at the end of the<br />

rout<strong>in</strong>e monitor<strong>in</strong>g data l<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> Figure 1, when Dar es Salaam data is <strong>in</strong>cluded for the first time.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!