Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter<br />
2<br />
An AnAlysis of household <strong>in</strong>CoMe<br />
And expenditure <strong>in</strong> tAnzAniA<br />
<strong>in</strong> Chapter 1 of this report, summary data from the household Budget survey 2007 were reported<br />
on the <strong>in</strong>cidence of household poverty <strong>in</strong> tanzania. this chapter provides detailed analysis of the<br />
hBs 2007 f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>and</strong> exam<strong>in</strong>es national progress <strong>in</strong> poverty reduction s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000/01.<br />
poverty rates are conventionally calculated aga<strong>in</strong>st a basket of commodities <strong>and</strong> services<br />
consumed. however, as shown <strong>in</strong> this chapter, studies that focus on consumption alone <strong>and</strong><br />
do not <strong>in</strong>clude asset ownership only partially exam<strong>in</strong>e household well-be<strong>in</strong>g. this is particularly<br />
pert<strong>in</strong>ent to the current national context as tanzanian households have not significantly changed<br />
their consumption of commodities <strong>and</strong> services s<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, but their assets have <strong>in</strong>creased.<br />
this chapter, therefore, looks at household well-be<strong>in</strong>g from four different perspectives: 93<br />
• household consumption, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g levels of consumption <strong>in</strong>equality<br />
•<br />
•<br />
•<br />
household expenditure patterns, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g food share of total consumption <strong>and</strong> purchases<br />
of goods with high <strong>in</strong>come elasticities<br />
Asset ownership, particularly consumer durables, productive assets <strong>and</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
household occupation <strong>and</strong> place of residence.<br />
evidence from the analysis consistently shows that household <strong>in</strong>come has not changed<br />
significantly between 2000/01 <strong>and</strong> 2007:<br />
i) <strong>in</strong>come levels are very low <strong>and</strong> have not changed significantly. the level of <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equality<br />
has also not changed. therefore, poverty <strong>in</strong>cidence has basically rema<strong>in</strong>ed the same.<br />
ii) poverty rema<strong>in</strong>s a rural phenomenon but it is largely concentrated <strong>in</strong> households heavily<br />
reliant on agriculture, particularly crop-dependent households.<br />
Household Consumption<br />
the hBs data reflect the monetary value of consumption on a monthly basis (expressed per<br />
28 days). Consumption <strong>in</strong>cludes purchased items <strong>and</strong> those produced <strong>and</strong> consumed by<br />
households. to enable comparisons to be made between the surveys conducted <strong>in</strong> 2000/01<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2007, items are valued at constant 2001 market prices. the consumption aggregate<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes food <strong>and</strong> other items <strong>and</strong> services rout<strong>in</strong>ely consumed by households: l<strong>in</strong>en, household<br />
93 this analysis looks solely at the <strong>in</strong>come-related aspects of household well-be<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> does not consider<br />
important non-<strong>in</strong>come aspects, such as health, education <strong>and</strong> water services.<br />
143