20.01.2013 Views

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter I CLUSter 1 GOaL 4 & 5<br />

proportion of their <strong>in</strong>comes on food (particularly staple foods); <strong>and</strong> (ii) the sector provides a<br />

reliable market for local non-agricultural activities.<br />

Modernisation of the agricultural sector – <strong>in</strong> which 95% of tanzania’s food is grown under<br />

traditional ra<strong>in</strong>-fed agriculture – is an ongo<strong>in</strong>g challenge fac<strong>in</strong>g the country. Production is<br />

vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, <strong>and</strong> the sector is characterised by over-reliance<br />

on primary agriculture, low fertility soils, m<strong>in</strong>imal use of external farm <strong>in</strong>puts, environmental<br />

degradation, significant food crop loss (both pre- <strong>and</strong> post- harvest), m<strong>in</strong>imal value addition <strong>and</strong><br />

product differentiation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate food storage <strong>and</strong> preservation that result <strong>in</strong> significant<br />

commodity price fluctuation. access to markets is a further hurdle that smallholders have to<br />

overcome. this problem is multi-faceted. Producers are commonly faced with poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />

to reach markets, barriers <strong>in</strong> penetrat<strong>in</strong>g markets due to limited resources, lack of <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />

few support mechanisms <strong>and</strong> restrictive policies.<br />

despite a clear government commitment to free <strong>in</strong>ternal trade <strong>in</strong> agricultural produce, regional<br />

<strong>and</strong> district authorities often use their residual powers to declare their jurisdictions as “food<br />

<strong>in</strong>secure” so as to restrict or ban movement of maize, wheat or rice. this practice penalises local<br />

producers <strong>and</strong> traders, who are unable to take advantage of higher market prices elsewhere,<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits the development of trade <strong>in</strong> staple foods. Moreover, farmers typically respond by<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g smaller volumes, thus leav<strong>in</strong>g the locality less food secure <strong>in</strong> the long run. the net effect<br />

is to reduce commercial agriculture at all scales of operation, <strong>and</strong> therefore, to reduce growth <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> productivity.<br />

these issues equally apply to external trade. the official prohibition on export of food crops<br />

<strong>in</strong>hibits production <strong>and</strong> restricts farmers’ <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong> areas of the country which have closer<br />

<strong>in</strong>frastructural connections with neighbour<strong>in</strong>g states than with parts of the country which are<br />

short of food. the overall costs of this policy – <strong>in</strong> transportation, lost production <strong>and</strong> stagnant<br />

household <strong>in</strong>come – may well not be balanced by the benefits of satisfy<strong>in</strong>g national food<br />

requirements from domestic production.<br />

opportunities therefore exist, nationally <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally, which could promote <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

production, productivity <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>comes from food agriculture. to take advantage of these<br />

opportunities, staple foods must be considered as commercial crops, as well as safeguards for<br />

domestic food security. the co-existence of relatively low levels of smallholder productivity <strong>in</strong><br />

tanzania yet widespread use of technical knowledge <strong>and</strong> productivity-enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>in</strong> many<br />

other parts of the world <strong>in</strong>dicates the need to remove barriers to the distribution of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts. agricultural transformation – <strong>and</strong> consequently economic structural transformation – can<br />

only be realised if key actors <strong>in</strong> technology generation, <strong>in</strong>stitution build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> policy formulation<br />

work collaboratively <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> a coord<strong>in</strong>ated fashion.<br />

Policies are needed that go beyond liberalisation to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>centives for smallholder farmers<br />

to engage <strong>in</strong> new productive patterns of <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>and</strong> exchange. this implies a major role for<br />

future research <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g organisational arrangements that can facilitate smallholder access<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!