Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter I CLUSter 1 GOaL 4 & 5<br />
proportion of their <strong>in</strong>comes on food (particularly staple foods); <strong>and</strong> (ii) the sector provides a<br />
reliable market for local non-agricultural activities.<br />
Modernisation of the agricultural sector – <strong>in</strong> which 95% of tanzania’s food is grown under<br />
traditional ra<strong>in</strong>-fed agriculture – is an ongo<strong>in</strong>g challenge fac<strong>in</strong>g the country. Production is<br />
vulnerable to adverse weather conditions, <strong>and</strong> the sector is characterised by over-reliance<br />
on primary agriculture, low fertility soils, m<strong>in</strong>imal use of external farm <strong>in</strong>puts, environmental<br />
degradation, significant food crop loss (both pre- <strong>and</strong> post- harvest), m<strong>in</strong>imal value addition <strong>and</strong><br />
product differentiation, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>adequate food storage <strong>and</strong> preservation that result <strong>in</strong> significant<br />
commodity price fluctuation. access to markets is a further hurdle that smallholders have to<br />
overcome. this problem is multi-faceted. Producers are commonly faced with poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
to reach markets, barriers <strong>in</strong> penetrat<strong>in</strong>g markets due to limited resources, lack of <strong>in</strong>formation,<br />
few support mechanisms <strong>and</strong> restrictive policies.<br />
despite a clear government commitment to free <strong>in</strong>ternal trade <strong>in</strong> agricultural produce, regional<br />
<strong>and</strong> district authorities often use their residual powers to declare their jurisdictions as “food<br />
<strong>in</strong>secure” so as to restrict or ban movement of maize, wheat or rice. this practice penalises local<br />
producers <strong>and</strong> traders, who are unable to take advantage of higher market prices elsewhere,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>hibits the development of trade <strong>in</strong> staple foods. Moreover, farmers typically respond by<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g smaller volumes, thus leav<strong>in</strong>g the locality less food secure <strong>in</strong> the long run. the net effect<br />
is to reduce commercial agriculture at all scales of operation, <strong>and</strong> therefore, to reduce growth <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>comes <strong>and</strong> productivity.<br />
these issues equally apply to external trade. the official prohibition on export of food crops<br />
<strong>in</strong>hibits production <strong>and</strong> restricts farmers’ <strong>in</strong>comes <strong>in</strong> areas of the country which have closer<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructural connections with neighbour<strong>in</strong>g states than with parts of the country which are<br />
short of food. the overall costs of this policy – <strong>in</strong> transportation, lost production <strong>and</strong> stagnant<br />
household <strong>in</strong>come – may well not be balanced by the benefits of satisfy<strong>in</strong>g national food<br />
requirements from domestic production.<br />
opportunities therefore exist, nationally <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternationally, which could promote <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
production, productivity <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>comes from food agriculture. to take advantage of these<br />
opportunities, staple foods must be considered as commercial crops, as well as safeguards for<br />
domestic food security. the co-existence of relatively low levels of smallholder productivity <strong>in</strong><br />
tanzania yet widespread use of technical knowledge <strong>and</strong> productivity-enhanc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>puts <strong>in</strong> many<br />
other parts of the world <strong>in</strong>dicates the need to remove barriers to the distribution of <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>puts. agricultural transformation – <strong>and</strong> consequently economic structural transformation – can<br />
only be realised if key actors <strong>in</strong> technology generation, <strong>in</strong>stitution build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> policy formulation<br />
work collaboratively <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> a coord<strong>in</strong>ated fashion.<br />
Policies are needed that go beyond liberalisation to <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>centives for smallholder farmers<br />
to engage <strong>in</strong> new productive patterns of <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>and</strong> exchange. this implies a major role for<br />
future research <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g organisational arrangements that can facilitate smallholder access<br />
25