Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Conclusion<br />
Chapter 2<br />
<strong>in</strong>come poverty rates overall changed little between 2000/01 <strong>and</strong> 2007, as reflected <strong>in</strong> the<br />
nearly constant levels of household consumption <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equality over this period. At<br />
national level, household consumption per capita <strong>in</strong>creased by only 5%, imply<strong>in</strong>g an average<br />
change of 0.8% annually. At the same time, <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equality rema<strong>in</strong>ed at close to the same<br />
level – the poorest group of households experienced a small fall <strong>in</strong> consumption, while the least<br />
poor group experienced a slightly larger <strong>in</strong>crease. results from expenditure patterns <strong>and</strong> asset<br />
ownership, are consistent with the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>in</strong>come poverty levels have barely changed. As<br />
a consequence, the MKuKutA target for <strong>in</strong>come poverty reduction is now out of reach, <strong>and</strong><br />
tanzania faces a huge challenge to achieve MdG1 by 2015. to do so will require annual real<br />
consumption growth of 3.2% per capita, four times higher than the exist<strong>in</strong>g level. encourag<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />
from a policy perspective, a significant proportion of households have consumption levels not<br />
far below the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
data show that household consumption is extremely low. Almost 98% of households spend<br />
less than tshs 58,000 per month per adult equivalent on food <strong>and</strong> basic necessities (2007<br />
prices), <strong>and</strong> approximately 80% spend less than tshs 38,600 per month or tshs 1,380 per<br />
day. to achieve mean<strong>in</strong>gful change <strong>in</strong> household well-be<strong>in</strong>g, consumption levels must <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
significantly. Cont<strong>in</strong>ued high rates of economic growth over the long term will be required.<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce tanzania’s level of <strong>in</strong>come <strong>in</strong>equality is currently low, even by <strong>in</strong>ternational st<strong>and</strong>ards,<br />
redistribution of <strong>in</strong>come is not likely to be effective.<br />
ownership of consumer durables, productive assets <strong>and</strong> the quality of hous<strong>in</strong>g did improve for<br />
all wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tiles <strong>in</strong> both rural <strong>and</strong> urban areas. this was largely the result of fall<strong>in</strong>g prices for<br />
these assets, which enabled tanzanians to buy more for less money. <strong>in</strong> part, this reflects the<br />
positive change to a more liberalised market environment <strong>in</strong> tanzania.<br />
poverty rema<strong>in</strong>s an overwhelm<strong>in</strong>gly agricultural phenomenon, particularly among cropdependent<br />
households. the majority of tanzanians rema<strong>in</strong> engaged <strong>in</strong> agriculture, but it is<br />
the least remunerative sector <strong>in</strong> the economy, with a household poverty rate of 38.7%. the<br />
comb<strong>in</strong>ation of the large portion of the population engaged <strong>in</strong> agriculture <strong>and</strong> high poverty<br />
rates expla<strong>in</strong>s why three-quarters of the poor are dependent on agriculture. households are<br />
diversify<strong>in</strong>g out of agriculture seek<strong>in</strong>g to improve their well-be<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>in</strong>deed, diversification of<br />
<strong>in</strong>come-generat<strong>in</strong>g activities is occurr<strong>in</strong>g across all wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tiles. however, the success of<br />
households <strong>in</strong> diversification, as reflected <strong>in</strong> the amount earned from non-farm activities, varies<br />
markedly across qu<strong>in</strong>tiles. the least poor households earn approximately eleven times more <strong>in</strong><br />
self-employment than do the poorest households. it would appear that the least poor households<br />
diversify to exploit opportunities, while the poorest households diversify out of desperation<br />
<strong>and</strong> for survival. these f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs have strong implications for the development of MKuKutA ii.<br />
Given that the majority of tanzanians will cont<strong>in</strong>ue to reside <strong>in</strong> rural areas <strong>and</strong> derive livelihood<br />
from agriculture, it is imperative to prioritise <strong>in</strong>terventions that raise agricultural productivity.<br />
furthermore, s<strong>in</strong>ce capabilities to identify <strong>and</strong> implement non-farm <strong>in</strong>come-generat<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />
take time to develop, programmes have to be developed to nurture <strong>and</strong> susta<strong>in</strong> household<br />
capabilities for successful diversification.<br />
169