20.01.2013 Views

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pOVertY aND hUMaN DeVeLOpMeNt repOrt <strong>2009</strong><br />

Social Protection<br />

The 2006 Integrated Labour Force Survey (IFLS) found that 25% of rural children <strong>and</strong> 8% of<br />

urban children were work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> conditions deemed to be child labour, most of which is timeexcessive.<br />

These children are required by their families to perform domestic chores <strong>and</strong>/or help<br />

out on the farm for such long hours that it may jeopardise school attendance or performance.<br />

The <strong>Tanzania</strong> Disability Survey 2008 – the first rigorous national survey of disability <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong><br />

– shows that only 40% of children with disabilities are attend<strong>in</strong>g primary school, an attendance<br />

rate which is less than half the rate for <strong>Tanzania</strong>n children overall. Positively, the attendance rate<br />

of orphaned children is very similar to that of children who have not been orphaned.<br />

The Household Budget Survey (HBS) 2007 pa<strong>in</strong>ts a mixed picture of the vulnerability of the<br />

elderly, with the poverty rate among households with only elderly persons well below the<br />

national average. However, the HBS also revealed that over 80% of elderly people who reported<br />

attend<strong>in</strong>g government health facilities had to pay for services (for medic<strong>in</strong>es, laboratory tests or a<br />

consultation fee). The exemption policy stipulates that exemptions be extended to elderly people<br />

(aged 60 years <strong>and</strong> over) who are unable to share the costs.<br />

<strong>Poverty</strong> <strong>in</strong> households with only children <strong>and</strong> elderly persons is slightly higher than among<br />

the population as a whole, but not so different that target<strong>in</strong>g such households based on this<br />

categorisation alone would be an effective strategy. In general, target<strong>in</strong>g is problematic where there<br />

is widespread poverty, <strong>and</strong> many people live close to the poverty l<strong>in</strong>e, as is the case <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tanzania</strong>.<br />

governance <strong>and</strong> Accountability<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce 1997, the <strong>Tanzania</strong>n Government has been engaged <strong>in</strong> transferr<strong>in</strong>g the duties <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

resources for deliver<strong>in</strong>g public services from central government m<strong>in</strong>istries to local government<br />

authorities (LGAs) – a process of decentralisation by devolution. The long-term goal of local<br />

government reform is to reduce the proportion of <strong>Tanzania</strong>ns liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> poverty, by improv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

citizens’ access to quality public services provided through autonomous local authorities. Key<br />

components of the fiscal reforms <strong>in</strong>clude provision of formula-based allocations to LGAs for<br />

recurrent expenditures <strong>in</strong> six key sectors – education, health, local roads, agriculture, water<br />

<strong>and</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration – <strong>and</strong> a new jo<strong>in</strong>t donor-Government funded block grant for development,<br />

the Local Government Capital <strong>Development</strong> Grant (LGCDG). In particular, the <strong>in</strong>troduction of<br />

formula-based f<strong>in</strong>ancial allocations based on population <strong>and</strong> other needs-based criteria aimed<br />

to gradually redress disparities <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g between districts.<br />

Data show that 98% of councils have qualified for the LGCDG <strong>in</strong> the <strong>2009</strong>/10 budget. However,<br />

formula-based allocations, which are predom<strong>in</strong>antly composed of personal emoluments (PE) for<br />

staff, have not yet been fully implemented. Staff recruitment <strong>and</strong> deployment have rema<strong>in</strong>ed largely<br />

centralised. The prevail<strong>in</strong>g practice allocates staff <strong>and</strong> funds based on staff<strong>in</strong>g norms for district<br />

facilities. Districts with exist<strong>in</strong>g facilities, therefore, tend to receive greater funds than districts with<br />

limited facilities <strong>and</strong> staff, hence perpetuat<strong>in</strong>g historical disparities <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>and</strong> human resources<br />

<strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> turn, service provision <strong>and</strong> outcomes. Analysis also <strong>in</strong>dicates that local expenditure patterns<br />

are largely driven by the fiscal transfer system, which limits the discretion of local authorities to<br />

xxiv

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!