Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Poverty and Human Development Report 2009 - UNDP in Tanzania
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
POVERTY AND HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT <strong>2009</strong><br />
Two citizen surveys conducted <strong>in</strong> six local government authorities <strong>in</strong> 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2006 <strong>in</strong>dicate<br />
<strong>in</strong>creased citizen participation <strong>in</strong> local government <strong>in</strong>stitutions as well as other community<br />
groups (Table 21). Citizens’ <strong>in</strong>volvement particularly <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> various sector-specific local<br />
committees, such as school committees, water committees, public works committees <strong>and</strong><br />
farmers’ groups.<br />
Table 21: Indicators of Community Participation, 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2006<br />
Respondents who report that they are or<br />
a household member is <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong>…<br />
2003 (% of<br />
respondents)<br />
2006 (% of<br />
respondents)<br />
Change<br />
between the<br />
two surveys<br />
Member of village/ward leadership 17.3 22.9 32%<br />
Participation <strong>in</strong> full council meet<strong>in</strong>gs 24.2 28.1 16%<br />
School committee member 28.2 35.8 27%<br />
Water management committee 13.3 23.2 74%<br />
Preparation of village/ward plans 19.7 35.0 78%<br />
<strong>Tanzania</strong> Social Action Fund (TASAF) project<br />
committee<br />
1.9 13.7 621%<br />
Public works committee 8.8 19.1 117%<br />
Primary cooperatives/society/farmers<br />
association<br />
8.7 12.1 39%<br />
Agricultural/livestock extension contact<br />
group<br />
2.9 6.4 121%<br />
Source: Formative Process Research Programme on local government reform, 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2006<br />
(See Tidem<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> Msami, forthcom<strong>in</strong>g).<br />
The surveys also <strong>in</strong>dicate higher levels of community participation <strong>in</strong> rural compared to urban<br />
areas, which was also documented <strong>in</strong> the Views of the People (VOP) survey <strong>in</strong> 2007. 68<br />
Another important <strong>in</strong>dicator of greater participation <strong>in</strong> local government affairs is the <strong>in</strong>crease<br />
<strong>in</strong> the percentage of respondents who reported <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> ‘preparation of village/ward<br />
plans’ from 19.7% of respondents <strong>in</strong> 2003 to 35% <strong>in</strong> 2006, represent<strong>in</strong>g a 78% <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
overall participation between the two surveys. This likely reflects Government efforts to enhance<br />
community participation <strong>in</strong> development plann<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> budget<strong>in</strong>g through the Opportunities <strong>and</strong><br />
Obstacles for <strong>Development</strong> [O & OD] plann<strong>in</strong>g process facilitated by the Prime M<strong>in</strong>ister’s Office<br />
– Regional Adm<strong>in</strong>istration <strong>and</strong> Local Government (PMO-RALG) as well as externally-supported<br />
sector <strong>in</strong>itiatives <strong>and</strong> TASAF projects. The relative high level of citizen participation <strong>in</strong> ‘plann<strong>in</strong>g’<br />
was also confirmed by Views of the People 2007. 69<br />
68 RAWG, 2008, Chapter 13.<br />
69 Note that participants <strong>in</strong> the VOP survey were asked about their <strong>in</strong>dividual behaviour whereas the local<br />
government surveys asked about “whether you or household member participated <strong>in</strong>…”<br />
110