STF NA MÍDIA
STF NA MÍDIA
STF NA MÍDIA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Mr. Bopp is right that the<br />
Supreme Court has long<br />
been comfortable with disclosure<br />
requirements. But<br />
Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, a law<br />
professor at Stetson University<br />
in Florida, said that lower<br />
courts had in the years<br />
before Citizens United grown<br />
skeptical of compulsory<br />
transparency, sometimes<br />
saying that it chilled First<br />
amendment rights by imposing<br />
burdensome reporting<br />
requirements. “Before Citizens<br />
United, there was a very<br />
alarming trend in this area,”<br />
she said.<br />
In a recent article in the Georgia<br />
State University Law<br />
Review, Professor Torres-<br />
Spelliscy described “the<br />
dramatic 180-degree turn that<br />
the law has taken” in the wake<br />
of Citizens United on the<br />
issue of disclosure.<br />
These days, Professor Hasen<br />
said, “lower courts have been<br />
taking their cue from Citizens<br />
United that disclosure<br />
laws, even if they are intrusive,<br />
are Constitutional.”<br />
JUSTIÇA NO EXTERIOR •<br />
THE NEW YORK TIMES (US) • <strong>NA</strong>TIO<strong>NA</strong>L • 19/9/2011<br />
Proposition 8 Hearing Video Is Ordered Released by Judge<br />
By JOHN SCHWARTZ<br />
A federal judge has ordered<br />
the release of the video recordings<br />
of hearings on Proposition<br />
8, California’s ban<br />
on same-sex marriage.<br />
Proponents of the initiative<br />
had fought the release of the<br />
recordings, but Judge James<br />
Ware of Federal District<br />
Court said in a 14-page opinion<br />
that public access to<br />
trials and court records was<br />
“foremost among the aspects<br />
of the federal judicial system<br />
that foster public confidence<br />
in the fairness and integrity<br />
of the process.”<br />
The video record was controversial<br />
even before the<br />
trial, in which plaintiffs asked<br />
that Proposition 8 be<br />
struck down as unconstitutional.<br />
Judge Vaughn R. Walker,<br />
who heard the case, initially<br />
approved a plaintiffs’<br />
motion to have the proceedings<br />
recorded and even broadcast.<br />
The Supreme Court<br />
reversed Judge Walker in<br />
January 2010, but Judge<br />
Walker then allowed the video<br />
to be produced for the<br />
court record.<br />
Since Judge Walker struck<br />
down the law in August 2010<br />
— the decision is being appealed<br />
— the fight has broadened<br />
to include the question<br />
of releasing the video. Proponents<br />
of Proposition 8 protested<br />
Judge Walker’s use of<br />
excerpts from the recordings<br />
in classes after he retired, and<br />
a coalition of media companies,<br />
including The New<br />
York Times, pressed for the<br />
release of the recordings.<br />
Judge Ware, who took over<br />
the case after Judge Walker’s<br />
retirement, has held off enforcement<br />
of Monday’s order<br />
until Sept. 30 to allow appeals.<br />
Andrew Pugno, general<br />
counsel for the National Organization<br />
for Marriage, said<br />
the appeal would come immediately.<br />
“Today’s decision<br />
is bizarre for many reasons,”<br />
Mr. Pugno said, “but mostly<br />
because it defies a direct order<br />
of the U.S. Supreme<br />
Court.”<br />
Chad Griffin, board president<br />
of the American Foundation<br />
for Equal Rights, a group that<br />
led the legal fight against<br />
Proposition 8, said Americans<br />
would be able “to see<br />
the case they put on and the<br />
case we put on, and they can<br />
decide whether the case was<br />
properly decided.”<br />
Mr. Griffin said he got the<br />
news about the ruling in New<br />
York during a rehearsal of<br />
Monday’s one-night reading<br />
of a new play, “8,” based on<br />
the trial.<br />
S T F N A M Í D I A • 2 2 d e s e t e m b r o d e 2 0 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P Á G I N A 2 0 9