22.11.2013 Views

STF NA MÍDIA

STF NA MÍDIA

STF NA MÍDIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pendent police chiefs to account,<br />

but it is our duty.<br />

Not so long ago, Mr West<br />

conceded that the police service<br />

"has a professional arrogance,<br />

saying we know what<br />

s best for you". I would not<br />

have said this, but I concur<br />

with the words he used next:<br />

"It is incumbent on us as<br />

public servants to engage<br />

with [the public] and to listen<br />

to what their concerns are<br />

and respond accordingly."<br />

Indeed it is.<br />

JUSTIÇA NO EXTERIOR •<br />

THE GUARDIAN (LO) • NEWS • 20/9/2011<br />

Health bill changes in Lords will be accepted, says Lib Dem minister<br />

Paul Burstow admits peers will improve bill next month as Baroness Williams warns of<br />

holding it up with amendments<br />

Nicholas Watt<br />

The government is to accept<br />

further changes to its health<br />

plans after Lady Williams,<br />

the veteran Liberal Democrat,<br />

warned that peers are<br />

prepared to hold up the health<br />

and social care bill in the<br />

House of Lords.<br />

As a leading Lib Dem rebel<br />

in the Commons condemned<br />

the bill as a "huge strategic<br />

mistake", the health minister<br />

Paul Burstow admitted that<br />

peers would improve the bill<br />

next month.<br />

Peers are to consider the bill<br />

after more than 1,000 a-<br />

mendments were rushed<br />

through the House of Commons<br />

earlier this month in<br />

the wake of the government s<br />

"listening exercise".<br />

Burstow, the Lib Dem health<br />

minister, said the government<br />

was still open to change.<br />

"We didn t stop listening<br />

when the listening exercise<br />

ended," he told the Lib Dem<br />

conference in a question and<br />

answer session on health.<br />

"We haven t stopped reflecting<br />

on the concerns that colleagues<br />

have. We haven t<br />

stopped making changes<br />

where we think they are necessary.<br />

I have never known<br />

a bill in my 14 years in parliament<br />

that has gone to the<br />

House of Lords and come<br />

back exactly as it was when<br />

it left the House of Commons.<br />

The House of Lords<br />

revises, it improves, it challenges<br />

and that is what it will<br />

do with the health and social<br />

care bill. That is exactly what<br />

it should do."<br />

Burstow s remarks came after<br />

Williams outlined her<br />

demands:<br />

• Get rid of the "so-called<br />

autonomy clause" which says<br />

the secretary of state may not<br />

affect the autonomy of the<br />

health bodies who now have<br />

the main responsibility in the<br />

reformed NHS – Monitor and<br />

the commissioning board.<br />

• The secretary of state must<br />

retain the residual responsibility<br />

for securing the provision<br />

of a comprehensive health<br />

service to all people in this<br />

country.<br />

Williams said: "If we can get<br />

those two as well then we<br />

can live reasonably comfortably<br />

with the proposals that<br />

are before us."<br />

But Williams said peers<br />

could make trouble if ministers<br />

fail to take notice. "There<br />

is now a huge responsibility<br />

on the House of Lords to<br />

go through and scrutinise the<br />

bill in vast detail. And they<br />

will.<br />

"We reckon there is going to<br />

be something like 10 or 12<br />

days on the committee. That<br />

means there will be detailed<br />

scrutiny. I promise you a lot<br />

of the Lords will want to ask<br />

questions on almost every<br />

aspect of the bill. As well as<br />

having time it [the House of<br />

Lords] can determine its own<br />

time which isn t true of the<br />

House of Commons … The<br />

whips are much more powerful<br />

in the Commons than<br />

they are in the Lords. So the<br />

relatively easy passage that<br />

the bill had – and I regret this<br />

– through its second reading<br />

in the Commons will not be<br />

duplicated in the Lords without<br />

some substantial further<br />

concession."<br />

Burstow praised Williams.<br />

But he said that her concerns<br />

about the role of the secretary<br />

of state had been addressed<br />

in the bill.<br />

S T F N A M Í D I A • 2 2 d e s e t e m b r o d e 2 0 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P Á G I N A 2 3 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!