STF NA MÍDIA
STF NA MÍDIA
STF NA MÍDIA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
pendent police chiefs to account,<br />
but it is our duty.<br />
Not so long ago, Mr West<br />
conceded that the police service<br />
"has a professional arrogance,<br />
saying we know what<br />
s best for you". I would not<br />
have said this, but I concur<br />
with the words he used next:<br />
"It is incumbent on us as<br />
public servants to engage<br />
with [the public] and to listen<br />
to what their concerns are<br />
and respond accordingly."<br />
Indeed it is.<br />
JUSTIÇA NO EXTERIOR •<br />
THE GUARDIAN (LO) • NEWS • 20/9/2011<br />
Health bill changes in Lords will be accepted, says Lib Dem minister<br />
Paul Burstow admits peers will improve bill next month as Baroness Williams warns of<br />
holding it up with amendments<br />
Nicholas Watt<br />
The government is to accept<br />
further changes to its health<br />
plans after Lady Williams,<br />
the veteran Liberal Democrat,<br />
warned that peers are<br />
prepared to hold up the health<br />
and social care bill in the<br />
House of Lords.<br />
As a leading Lib Dem rebel<br />
in the Commons condemned<br />
the bill as a "huge strategic<br />
mistake", the health minister<br />
Paul Burstow admitted that<br />
peers would improve the bill<br />
next month.<br />
Peers are to consider the bill<br />
after more than 1,000 a-<br />
mendments were rushed<br />
through the House of Commons<br />
earlier this month in<br />
the wake of the government s<br />
"listening exercise".<br />
Burstow, the Lib Dem health<br />
minister, said the government<br />
was still open to change.<br />
"We didn t stop listening<br />
when the listening exercise<br />
ended," he told the Lib Dem<br />
conference in a question and<br />
answer session on health.<br />
"We haven t stopped reflecting<br />
on the concerns that colleagues<br />
have. We haven t<br />
stopped making changes<br />
where we think they are necessary.<br />
I have never known<br />
a bill in my 14 years in parliament<br />
that has gone to the<br />
House of Lords and come<br />
back exactly as it was when<br />
it left the House of Commons.<br />
The House of Lords<br />
revises, it improves, it challenges<br />
and that is what it will<br />
do with the health and social<br />
care bill. That is exactly what<br />
it should do."<br />
Burstow s remarks came after<br />
Williams outlined her<br />
demands:<br />
• Get rid of the "so-called<br />
autonomy clause" which says<br />
the secretary of state may not<br />
affect the autonomy of the<br />
health bodies who now have<br />
the main responsibility in the<br />
reformed NHS – Monitor and<br />
the commissioning board.<br />
• The secretary of state must<br />
retain the residual responsibility<br />
for securing the provision<br />
of a comprehensive health<br />
service to all people in this<br />
country.<br />
Williams said: "If we can get<br />
those two as well then we<br />
can live reasonably comfortably<br />
with the proposals that<br />
are before us."<br />
But Williams said peers<br />
could make trouble if ministers<br />
fail to take notice. "There<br />
is now a huge responsibility<br />
on the House of Lords to<br />
go through and scrutinise the<br />
bill in vast detail. And they<br />
will.<br />
"We reckon there is going to<br />
be something like 10 or 12<br />
days on the committee. That<br />
means there will be detailed<br />
scrutiny. I promise you a lot<br />
of the Lords will want to ask<br />
questions on almost every<br />
aspect of the bill. As well as<br />
having time it [the House of<br />
Lords] can determine its own<br />
time which isn t true of the<br />
House of Commons … The<br />
whips are much more powerful<br />
in the Commons than<br />
they are in the Lords. So the<br />
relatively easy passage that<br />
the bill had – and I regret this<br />
– through its second reading<br />
in the Commons will not be<br />
duplicated in the Lords without<br />
some substantial further<br />
concession."<br />
Burstow praised Williams.<br />
But he said that her concerns<br />
about the role of the secretary<br />
of state had been addressed<br />
in the bill.<br />
S T F N A M Í D I A • 2 2 d e s e t e m b r o d e 2 0 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P Á G I N A 2 3 9