22.11.2013 Views

STF NA MÍDIA

STF NA MÍDIA

STF NA MÍDIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ment, have responded with a<br />

campaign to “take back the<br />

Constitution.” They are urging<br />

Americans and lawmakers<br />

to sign a pledge to honor<br />

the whole Constitution, e-<br />

ven the parts many Tea Party<br />

supporters would prefer to<br />

ignore — say, the amendments<br />

allowing an income<br />

tax, and granting birthright<br />

citizenship. And they are<br />

trying to get people to see the<br />

Constitution not as a limit<br />

on federal power but as the<br />

spirit behind progressive<br />

laws.<br />

The struggle over the holiday<br />

is yet another proxy in the<br />

fight over the proper role of<br />

government. On one side are<br />

those who embrace an “originalist”<br />

view of the Constitution,<br />

where New Deal judicial<br />

activism started the<br />

country down the path to<br />

ruin. On the other are those<br />

who say that its language —<br />

allowing Congress to levy<br />

taxes to provide “for the general<br />

welfare,” to regulate<br />

commerce, and to do what is<br />

“necessary and proper” to<br />

carry out its role — affirms<br />

the broad role of the federal<br />

government that has developed<br />

over the last 100 years.<br />

“It has evolved to the point<br />

where it seems many in the<br />

Tea Party believe the entire<br />

20th century is unconstitutional,”<br />

said Doug Kendall, the<br />

president of the Constitutional<br />

Accountability Center<br />

and a leader of the progressive<br />

coalition behind the effort<br />

to, in his words, “rebut the<br />

fairy tales being peddled by<br />

the Tea Party.”<br />

This may seem like a fight<br />

reserved to costumed Revolutionary<br />

War re-enactors —<br />

or Ron Paul supporters, who<br />

will commemorate the holiday,<br />

as they have the anniversary<br />

of the Boston Tea<br />

Party, with a fund-raising<br />

event. But the question of<br />

who owns the Constitution<br />

has very current implications<br />

in the fights over Social Security<br />

and Medicare, and<br />

most immediately, in the<br />

court challenges to the health<br />

care overhaul that Democrats<br />

passed and Tea Party supporters<br />

loathe.<br />

In one respect, the Tea Party<br />

has already won. When<br />

groups on the left talk about<br />

the Constitution, they are<br />

increasingly emphasizing the<br />

original text — as the originalists<br />

do — rather than the<br />

Supreme Court decisions<br />

that have upheld programs<br />

like Social Security.<br />

Tea Party Patriots, a large<br />

umbrella for groups across<br />

the country, began encouraging<br />

its members this year to<br />

“adopt a school” for the<br />

Constitution Week, next<br />

week. It provided local<br />

groups with templates for a<br />

series of letters to school<br />

superintendents, to inform<br />

them about a law passed in<br />

2004 that requires schools<br />

that receive federal money to<br />

teach about the Constitution<br />

on Sept. 17, or the adjacent<br />

days.<br />

(The letters did not mention<br />

that the law was the work of<br />

Senator Robert C. Byrd, who<br />

was famous as a champion of<br />

the Constitution, but also of<br />

the kind of big government<br />

liberalism that the Tea Party<br />

believes the Constitution is<br />

intended to constrain.)<br />

Tea Party groups were instructed<br />

to ask schools how<br />

they planned to observe the<br />

law, and to suggest that they<br />

use a curriculum provided by<br />

the National Center for<br />

Constitutional Studies.<br />

The center, based in Arizona,<br />

offers books and courses now<br />

popular among Tea Party<br />

groups — including “The<br />

5000 Year Leap,” made a<br />

bestseller by Glenn Beck’s<br />

recommendation. They emphasize<br />

the 10th amendment<br />

in arguing for states’ rights,<br />

and argue that the income tax<br />

was a progressive perversion<br />

of the Constitution and that<br />

the founding fathers did not<br />

intend the separation of church<br />

and state. (The course<br />

materials also show how to<br />

memorize the preamble to<br />

the Constitution using sign<br />

language.)<br />

Tea Party Patriots also distributed<br />

a new coloring book<br />

that argues that the government<br />

has “grown far beyond<br />

what the Constitution allows,”<br />

and casts modern-day<br />

Tea Party groups in the role<br />

of the original colonists, fighting<br />

for freedom against an<br />

overbearing government.<br />

“A lot of what happens in<br />

Washington is not the process<br />

we agreed to in that<br />

Constitution,” said Bill Norton,<br />

who coordinated the<br />

adopt-a-school program for<br />

Tea Party Patriots.<br />

But he said the program was<br />

not political. “We go right<br />

back to the founders when it<br />

comes to the Constitution,”<br />

he said. “The material we’re<br />

bringing in is very historical,<br />

there’s no agenda in either<br />

direction.”<br />

S T F N A M Í D I A • 2 2 d e s e t e m b r o d e 2 0 1 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P Á G I N A 9 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!