27.06.2013 Views

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00009359, version 1 - 1 Jun 2005<br />

Chapitre 3 - Fonctionnement du réseau trophique benthique de la Grande Vasière<br />

On the offshore margin of the continental shelf (Stn. E), the higher near-bottom current mean<br />

velocity (ca. 12 cm.s -1 on September 13; Table 2) compared to the central ‘Grande Vasière’, led to<br />

sedimentation patterns closely associated with the tidal cycle (Fig. 10). The TPM flux in bottom traps<br />

followed a dome-shaped distribution centred on mid ebb-tide (maximum sedimentation rate between<br />

00:24 and 1:30 PM) on 13 September. Temporal variations in total sedimentation rate were low (from<br />

2.5 to 3.7 g.m -2 .h -1 ) during the study period. Three high-speed current events were superimposed on<br />

the tide-driven dome-shaped distribution of current velocities at the trap aperture (Fig. 10). These<br />

current peaks, known as solitary internal waves on the continental shelf (Pingree and Mardell, 1985;<br />

Mazé, 1987; B. Le Cann, LPO Brest and A. Serpette, EPSHOM Brest, pers. com.), were associated<br />

with light scattering increases 1.6 m off the seabed. In particular, the major turbidity event recorded<br />

between 2:00 and 3:00 PM occurred just after the main internal wave passing over. However, total<br />

particulate matter sedimentation was not correlated with these internal waves and the associated resuspension<br />

events: the main sedimentation peak occurred before and there was no increase in bottom<br />

trap sedimentation rates related with the increase of water turbidity after the internal waves passing<br />

over. Thus, these high-frequency events did not seem to disturb the tide-driven sedimentation process<br />

on the outer margin of the continental shelf.<br />

Re-suspension estimate<br />

Re-suspension mostly concerns mineral matter because of the low organic matter content in<br />

sediments (Table 6). This is confirmed by the composition of the particulate matter sedimented in the<br />

traps (eg. The POC:TPM ratios in Table 4). From the three methods used to estimate re-suspension,<br />

the one using the trap fluxes gave the highest rates. In September 2002, total particulate matter<br />

sedimentation rates in mid-depth and bottom traps were compared, assuming the absence of resuspension<br />

signal in the upper trap and settling particles all originating from the ‘Grande Vasière’<br />

surface waters. Re-suspension estimates were calculated only when the upper trap was located under<br />

the chlorophyll biomass maximum, that is stations A, C and G. At each station, more than 77% of the<br />

total sedimentation (TPM) in bottom traps would be linked to deposition of re-suspended benthic<br />

material. This feature was particularly conspicuous for the pure mud station (G) with a 94% rate. The<br />

mean TPM re-suspension rate would be of 82.5% (±7.8) on the central ‘Grande Vasière’. POC resuspension<br />

in the latter was lower (57.7%).<br />

Table 6. POC content (% dry weight) in superficial (0-0.5 cm) sediments of the study sites.<br />

Station A B C D E F G<br />

% POC Spring 0.15 0.26 0.21 0.24 - - 1.40<br />

% POC Summer 0.24 0.28 0.23 0.21 0.49 0.04 1.32<br />

Particulate matter re-suspension rates estimated from SPM concentrations in the water column<br />

were lower than the ones estimated from the trap fluxes. Mean values at stations A, G and E were<br />

56.72 ± 6.53% (range: 48.8-64.5%), 60.22 ± 2.96% (range: 58.2-63.6%), and 26.83 ± 9.85% (range:<br />

16.8-36.5%), respectively.<br />

199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!