27.06.2013 Views

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00009359, version 1 - 1 Jun 2005<br />

Chapitre 3 - Fonctionnement du réseau trophique benthique de la Grande Vasière<br />

test, α = 0.05) between surface and bottom POM, but a number of benthic organisms (bivalves,<br />

polychaetes, crustaceans) were significantly enriched in 13 C compared to some pelagic organisms<br />

(C. echinulatus or L. typicus) or benthic suspension feeders (Ascidia or C. subterranea). There was<br />

also a continuum of δ 13 C values in each taxonomic group.<br />

Hierarchical cluster analysis (Ward’s minimum variance method) performed on data for stable<br />

isotopic nitrogen and carbon ratios (Appendix A) identified three main groups of species on the<br />

dendrogram (scission values of 91.4 and 27.1 respectively), two of which were divided into two<br />

subgroups (scission values of 14.2 and 11.4 ; Figure 2).<br />

Figure 2: Hierarchical clustering (Ward’s minimum variance method) of stable carbon and nitrogen<br />

isotopes analysis from the ‘Grande Vasière’ benthic and demersal community.<br />

When δ 15 N and δ 13 C are plotted together in a two dimension plane (Figure 3) three groups of<br />

points are clearly identified 1: primary producers (surface POM and bottom POM), 2: consumers of<br />

the primary production (zooplancton, suprabenthos, ascidians, Hyalinoecia fauveli and Callianassa<br />

subterranea) and 3: others consumers. This last group can be decomposed into four sub-groups<br />

according the hierarchical classification results.<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!