27.06.2013 Views

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

Structure, fonctionnement, évolution des communautés benthiques ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00009359, version 1 - 1 Jun 2005<br />

Chapitre 3 - Fonctionnement du réseau trophique benthique de la Grande Vasière<br />

microheterotrophs and bacteria (Kang et al. 1999; Kreeger and Newell 2001), but also on dissolved<br />

organic carbon (Roditi et al. 2000). Such feeding preferences could lead to variations in the δ 13 C of<br />

species considered broadly as part of the deposit-feeder group. These results can be compared with<br />

those obtained by Fry (1988) for Georges Bank, an exploited benthic ecosystem in the same depth<br />

range. No marked variability of δ 15 N was found there between benthic and pelagic primary consumers<br />

(copepods, Euphausiacea, bivalves, benthic amphipods), but δ 13 C values for pelagic copepods and<br />

Euphausiacea were 2-3‰ lower than for benthic primary consumers. It was concluded that these<br />

differences reflect the influence of two different food sources or a modification of food quality.<br />

The third group is composed of secondary consumers consisting of species from the pelagic food web<br />

component, primarily because of food affinities (all species had δ 13 C < -16.7‰), and secondarily for<br />

their trophic level. The trophic level of the analyzed species ranged from 3 to 3.7, suggesting a mixed<br />

diet based on several different trophic levels.<br />

The third trophic level of the food web is composed of benthic and pelagic Crustacea,<br />

Polychaeta and bentho-pelagic fish (δ 15 N averaging 11‰). Among these species, analysis of the<br />

known behavioral features identified two groups: endo- and epibenthic species (group 2a of the<br />

dendrogram, Figure 2) demersal and suprabenthic species (group 3a of the dendrogram, Figure 2).<br />

Group 2a; the benthic web component ( δ 13 C close to – 16‰) is composed of surface and<br />

subsurface deposit feeders, carnivorous crustacean decapods (N. norvegicus, M. rugosa, L. depurator,<br />

G. rhomboi<strong>des</strong>), carnivorous crustacean peracarids (C. allmani) and polychaetes (N. caeca, G. rouxii).<br />

Group 3a; the pelagic web component is composed of species with δ 13 C averaging -19 to -<br />

18‰. These are the “true” pelagic feeders, i.e., the fish T. trachurus, the cephalopods Sepia sp., and<br />

some Crustacea, Mysidacea and peracarid shrimp (C. echinulatus, P. nouveli).<br />

The top predators, group 3b, which reached the fourth TL (3.6 to 4.0), had δ 15 N levels of up to<br />

14‰ in adult muscle tissues. These predators are not only demersal fishes such as the Atlantic hake<br />

adults, but also benthic crustaceans such as S. demaresti.<br />

In general, the trophic positions predicted by δ 15 N were in good agreement with data in the<br />

literature concerning fish and invertebrate diet and feeding behavior. However, three polychaete<br />

species which showed unexpected values require further investigation. Notomastus latericeus, with<br />

extensive distribution in coastal and intertidal muddy sediments, is considered to be a subsurface<br />

deposit feeder, like most members of the family Capitellidae. Terebelli<strong>des</strong> stroemi, a tubiculous of the<br />

family Terebellidae, is regarded as a surface deposit feeder, which catches particles of the organic<br />

superficial film with its palps and cirra (Fauchald and Jumars 1979). The results however have showed<br />

great variations in the δ 13 C values of this species, which suggests considerable variability of the food<br />

source, whereas δ 15 N values were higher than expected from its trophic behavior (i.e., primary<br />

consumers) as <strong>des</strong>cribed in the literature. Another species, Lumbrinereis impatiens, is a small surface<br />

carnivorous Lumbrinereidae that supposed feeds on benthic preys. Its δ 13 C values were lower than<br />

expected, which explains why it was grouped in the cluster of “pelagic component” species. Further<br />

isotopic measurements are required over a large environmental gradient to confirm these values.<br />

However, it is likely that the feeding behavior of these species is based on a selection of ingested food<br />

mainly composed of animal detritus and/or micro- and meio- fauna. As remarked previously for the<br />

bivalve Aequipecten opercularis these results emphasize another advantage of stable isotopic<br />

234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!