07.04.2013 Views

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

156 <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Insect</strong> <strong>Pests</strong>: <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Prospects</strong><br />

was possibly due to its requirement for large numbers <strong>of</strong> hosts, since 7 larvae<br />

consumed over 100 medium to large sized hosts during the last half <strong>of</strong> their<br />

larval lives. In Guatemala it is highly parasitised by two species <strong>of</strong> chalcidid<br />

wasps. Carter (1935) regarded it as a promising species for biological<br />

control.<br />

Vincentodiplosis pseudococci Dipt.: Cecidomyiidae<br />

This midge is native to Mexico and was established in Hawaii in 1950. In<br />

neglected, weedy pineapple plantations in Hawaii, where the ant Pheidole<br />

sp. was less reliant on mealybug honeydew, the midge was sufficiently<br />

effective in controlling D. brevipes as to almost completely eliminate the<br />

mealybug from the fruit. Many fruit were covered with the old webs<br />

produced by midge larvae, but there were no live mealybugs. The midge is<br />

rarely found on leaves, but its larvae are commonly found attacking large<br />

mealybugs at the base <strong>of</strong> the fruit (Carter 1935, 1944).<br />

Comments<br />

It is very likely that D. brevipes evolved in South and/or Central America<br />

and there is, therefore, a prima facie case to consider it as a candidate for<br />

classical biological control in <strong>Southeast</strong> Asia and the Pacific. Indeed, there<br />

are 2 parasitoid species (Anagyrus ananatis and Hambletonia<br />

pseudococcina: both Eulophidae) and 2 predator species (Vicentodiplosis<br />

pseudococci: Cecidomyiidae and Pseudiasta nebulosa: Diastadidae) that are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> reducing the mealybug to subeconomic levels. However, when<br />

any one or more <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> ant species attends the mealybug it is largely<br />

protected from natural enemies and is able to build up to damaging numbers.<br />

In the absence <strong>of</strong> both ants and natural enemies the unharvested honeydew it<br />

produces leads to heavy growth <strong>of</strong> sooty moulds and there is transmission <strong>of</strong><br />

pineapple mealybug wilt. Since apparently suitable natural enemies are<br />

available for introduction, the key to D. brevipes control is to deal with the<br />

attendant ants. There are several ant baits that have been used successfully<br />

for this purpose, but these are no longer registered for use in USA and,<br />

hence, cannot be recommended. No doubt suitable replacements will soon<br />

emerge. When extensive plantings <strong>of</strong> pineapples are made on areas where<br />

the soil has been worked to kill weeds, very few ant colonies survive.<br />

Recolonisation <strong>of</strong> the planted area occurs as colonies move along the rows<br />

towards the centre <strong>of</strong> the crop. One cultural method recommended to delay<br />

this spread is to plant several peripheral rows parallel to each boundary. Ants<br />

will then move along these, rather than into the crop and control measures<br />

can be concentrated on these rows (Rohrback et al. 1988). Promising results<br />

obtained with the integrated management <strong>of</strong> D. brevipes in Hawaii suggest<br />

that it would be well worth exploring similar methods elsewhere.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!