07.04.2013 Views

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

248 <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Insect</strong> <strong>Pests</strong>: <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Prospects</strong><br />

Chiang et al. (1978) surveyed the parasitoids <strong>of</strong> three agromyzids<br />

infesting mungbean, namely Ophiomyia phaseoli, O. centrosematis and<br />

Melanagromyza sojae. Parasitisation fluctuated considerably, surpassing<br />

60% during July, but declining to nearly 0% in December and January. Since<br />

there was a negative correlation between agromyzid populations and percent<br />

parasitisation it was concluded that parasitoids played a role in controlling<br />

agromyzid populations.<br />

THAILAND<br />

Surveys in several regions <strong>of</strong> Thailand for natural enemies <strong>of</strong> the major pest<br />

<strong>of</strong> soybean (Ophiomyia phaseoli) revealed 5 species <strong>of</strong> hymenopterous<br />

parasitoid and a nematode (Burikam 1978). The most important species<br />

were Plutarchia indefensa (Eurytomidae) and Fopius sp. (Braconidae). A<br />

eulophid, a pteromalid and a cynipid were less important (Burikam and<br />

Napompeth 1979; Napompeth 1994). Parasitisation by P. indefensa<br />

averaged 52.8% and two samples gave 7.5% and 5.9% for Fopius sp.<br />

(Burikam 1978), although Napompeth (1994) later considered the two<br />

species to be <strong>of</strong> equal importance. The cynipid wasp also attacked the bean<br />

stem miner Melanagromyza sojae. On one occasion pupae containing 20 to<br />

50 nematodes were recorded, with a pupal parasitisation rate <strong>of</strong> 4.6%<br />

(Burikam 1978). A life table analysis showed that there was a densitydependent<br />

factor regulating bean fly populations (Burikam and Napompeth<br />

1979).<br />

Unless Fopius sp. (Braconidae) proves to be Opius phaseoli<br />

(Braconidae) (which is present in both India and the Philippines), it appears<br />

that O. phaseoli may not be widespread throughout <strong>Southeast</strong> Asia and may<br />

be well worth distributing more widely. The identity <strong>of</strong> the Fopius sp. is to<br />

be investigated (B. Napompeth pers. comm. 1994).<br />

ZIMBABWE<br />

Phaseolus spp. are the principal host crops damaged, but cowpeas (Vigna<br />

sinensis) and soybeans (Glycine soja) are also attacked. Plantings in late<br />

summer are usually only lightly infested and a braconid, identified as Opius<br />

liogaster (but quite possibly O. phaseoli), exercises effective control in most<br />

years (Taylor 1958). Earlier Jack (1913) had reported that a braconid larval<br />

parasitoid was ineffective in controlling bean fly although it was bred freely<br />

from O. phaseoli late in the season.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!