07.04.2013 Views

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

Biological Control of Insect Pests: Southeast Asian Prospects - EcoPort

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

320 <strong>Biological</strong> <strong>Control</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Insect</strong> <strong>Pests</strong>: <strong>Southeast</strong> <strong>Asian</strong> <strong>Prospects</strong><br />

Damage<br />

families, although cultivated brassicas are those most favoured when<br />

available (Martin et al. 1976a; Sutherland and Greene 1984). Brassicas and<br />

cotton are most frequently cited as being damaged, although the list <strong>of</strong><br />

economic crops affected also includes asparagus, beans, sugarbeet,<br />

cantaloupes, capsicum, carrot, celery, maize (silks), cucumber, lettuce,<br />

parsley, pea, potato, soybean, spinach, squash, tobacco, tomato and<br />

watermelon.<br />

At times, serious infestations occur, but T. ni is generally regarded as a<br />

secondary pest whose numbers increase late in the season (Ehler 1977a,b).<br />

Differences in susceptibility to T. ni have been found in cabbage and<br />

related brassicas, in cotton and in lettuce (Cuthbert and Kishaba 1984), in<br />

tomato (Sinha and McLaren 1989) and in soybeans (Luedders et al. 1978;<br />

Khan et al. 1986), but these largely remain to be exploited. Transgenic<br />

cotton lines containing Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes limited damage to<br />

initial feeding sites, compared with more extensive skeletonisation in 2<br />

control cultivars (Flint et al. 1995). Transgenic Bt canola (rape) showed<br />

excellent resistance to T. ni (Stewart et al. 1996).<br />

Larvae are easily reared on an artificial diet (e.g. Shorey and Hale 1965;<br />

Honda et al. 1996).<br />

The cabbage looper is a major pest <strong>of</strong> commercial brassicas in North<br />

America and many other areas where it occurs and causes significant<br />

damage also, in particular, to lettuce, tomatoes, celery and cotton. Indeed,<br />

Schwartz (1983) claimed that, if uncontrolled, 92% loss would be sustained<br />

in the cotton yield in USA, compared with 30% if controlled. Larvae chew<br />

large irregular holes, leaving only main veins, in the outer leaves <strong>of</strong> cabbage,<br />

cauliflower and related plants, <strong>of</strong>ten leaving them riddled with holes. Later,<br />

the outer layers <strong>of</strong> cabbage heads are eaten and masses <strong>of</strong> faecal pellets<br />

contaminate the feeding sites. So much leaf tissue is eaten that heads <strong>of</strong><br />

cabbage and cauliflower are stunted and other leafy vegetables are rendered<br />

unfit to eat.<br />

Damage caused to cotton by the larvae consuming leaves is <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

considered less serious, since it frequently occurs late in the growth <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cotton plant, so that it may not have a major effect on yield. Cabbage looper<br />

larvae are essentially foliage feeders and cause their damage in this way.<br />

Natural enemies<br />

Over the last few decades T. ni has become a very widely used laboratory<br />

insect, particularly in North America. As a result, there are many papers

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!