30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 5<br />

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE ARCHAEOLOGY<br />

OF THE PRINCESS POINT COMPLEX IN SOUTHERN ONTARIO 1<br />

David G. Smith and Gary W. Crawford<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

The origins of food production, especially plant cultivation,<br />

have received widespread and intensive consideration<br />

in recent years (see Cowan and Watson<br />

1992a; Gebauer and Price 1992; Price and Gebauer<br />

1995; Smith 1992, 1995). They signal, if not underly, significant<br />

economic, social, and other cultural changes.<br />

Intensive research over the past two decades has done<br />

much to clarify the origins and nature of the earliest<br />

plant cultivation and domestication in the North<br />

American Eastern Woodlands. This area is not homogeneous,<br />

but includes several cultural and ecological<br />

zones with diverse historical trajectories. In the southern<br />

Midwest, indigenous domestication of plants preceded<br />

the subsequent intensification associated with<br />

the success of corn in the late second millennium B.P.<br />

Through the interpretive work of Gayle Fritz, Kristen<br />

Gremillion, Bruce Smith, Patty Jo Watson, and others,<br />

this region is no longer viewed as an area of secondary<br />

origins through diffusion. Rather, it is a region of<br />

indigenous domestication (Fritz 1990; Smith 1987,<br />

1992; Watson 1985, 1989). Horticultural origins in the<br />

Lower Great Lakes, central and southern New York<br />

and Pennsylvania as well as New England are,<br />

however, considered to be the result of “secondary<br />

origins;” that is, diffusion or migration or both (Cowan<br />

and Watson 1992b). The Lower Great Lakes region, in<br />

particular, lacks a cogent synthesis of agricultural origins<br />

based on rigorously collected and dated materials.<br />

To remedy this neglect, we have focused our research<br />

on the Princess Point Complex in southcentral Ontario<br />

(Figure 5.1) since 1993, and in this paper we report the<br />

contributions this program has made so far.<br />

After conducting a review of agricultural origins,<br />

Gebauer and Price (1992:3) note that there is no single,<br />

accepted, general theory for the origins of agriculture.<br />

Thus, we are turning in recent years to elucidating local<br />

processes to expand our database on the problem of<br />

agricultural origins. Southern Ontario is one region in<br />

the world that is surprisingly lacking in substantial<br />

information on the problem. Considering that horticulture<br />

became an important, if not predominant component<br />

of subsistence after A.D. 1000, this lack certainly<br />

hinders our understanding of Late Woodland Native<br />

economies in this region.<br />

In 1993, we initiated a research program to address a<br />

series of issues pertaining to the shift to crop production<br />

in the Lower Great Lakes. Princess Point is generally<br />

viewed as the context in which the transition from<br />

strictly hunting and gathering to a mixed horticulturalhunter-gatherer<br />

way of life took place in southern<br />

Ontario. Princess Point is one of a number of archaeological<br />

cultures in the Lower Great Lakes region dating<br />

to between 1,000 and 1,500 years ago, and is possibly<br />

ancestral to later Iroquoian societies in this region<br />

(Crawford and Smith 1996; Crawford et al. 1997a; Fox<br />

1990; Noble 1975; Smith and Crawford 1995; Stothers<br />

1977; Trigger 1985; Wright 1984). Princess Point was<br />

originally defined as a “complex” (Stothers 1977), but<br />

for reasons discussed below, we believe that the term<br />

“complex” no longer applies, although, for lack of a<br />

better alternative, we continue to use the term<br />

“Princess Point Complex.” Our research has removed<br />

any doubt that corn is associated with Princess Point<br />

contexts (Crawford et al. 1997a), and has provided the<br />

first detailed interdisciplinary examination of floodplains<br />

and agricultural origins in the <strong>Northeast</strong><br />

(Crawford et al. 1997b; Walker et al. 1997). This paper<br />

summarizes past research on Princess Point, details the<br />

work that we have conducted over the past three years,<br />

1 Originally published in Canadian Journal of Archaeology 21:9-32.<br />

Reprinted with the permission of the editor.<br />

<strong>Northeast</strong> <strong>Subsistence</strong>-<strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: A.D. <strong>700</strong><strong>–1300</strong> by John P. Hart and Christina B. Rieth. New York State Museum<br />

© 2002 by the University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, Albany, New York. All rights reserved.<br />

Chapter 5 Recent Developments in the Archaeology of the Princess Point Complex in Southern Ontario 97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!