30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

L<br />

a<br />

k<br />

e<br />

E<br />

r i e<br />

PENNSYLVANIA<br />

INDIANA<br />

River<br />

12<br />

O H I O<br />

e<br />

R<br />

i o<br />

iv<br />

o<br />

i<br />

O h<br />

Salt Rolling<br />

R<br />

i<br />

Fork<br />

v<br />

e<br />

r<br />

River<br />

Kentucky<br />

Great<br />

Miami<br />

Little Miami River<br />

2<br />

1<br />

3 13<br />

8<br />

14<br />

15<br />

16 17<br />

18<br />

19<br />

20<br />

River<br />

O<br />

h<br />

i o<br />

Licking River<br />

9<br />

23<br />

11<br />

10<br />

Scioto<br />

River<br />

22<br />

21<br />

KENTUCKY<br />

i<br />

R<br />

Ho cking River<br />

v e r<br />

Muskingum<br />

Kanawha<br />

R.<br />

River<br />

O h<br />

WEST<br />

VIRGINIA<br />

MARYLAND<br />

VIRGINIA<br />

LEGEND<br />

Turpin Phase Related Sites<br />

1. Guard<br />

8. Killen<br />

2. Leonard Haag 9. Enos Homes<br />

3. Stateline<br />

10. Howard Baum<br />

4. Watson<br />

11. Blain<br />

5. Horseshoe Johnson 12. Voss<br />

6. Madisonville<br />

7. Turpin<br />

Osborne Phase<br />

13. Cleek-McCabe<br />

14. Eagle Creek<br />

15. Dry Run<br />

16. Yates<br />

17. Jameson<br />

18. Grazier<br />

19. Moir<br />

20. 15-Mer-1<br />

Croghan Phase<br />

21. Feurt<br />

22. Thompson<br />

23. Scioto County<br />

Home<br />

0<br />

0<br />

50 miles<br />

80 kilometers<br />

N<br />

J. Skiba<br />

Figure 2.7. Map locating pre-A.D. 1200/1250 Late Prehistoric sites within the central<br />

Ohio River Valley.<br />

for some Turpin phase sites in southwestern Ohio as<br />

well (Cowan 1986).<br />

Beyond Ohio proper, supporting data for this<br />

transition are apparent from Kentucky sites, where<br />

settlement and technological developments of the<br />

Osborne and Crogham phases mirror those for southern<br />

Ohio (Sharp and Turnbow 1987; Turnbow and<br />

Sharp 1988). This pattern is at odds with that posited<br />

by Graybill (1981), who has argued for the exclusive<br />

existence of formally planned villages across southern<br />

Ohio shortly after A.D. 1000.<br />

Dwellings within these early sites are either circular<br />

or rectangular in shape, the latter form appearing for<br />

the first time in both Kentucky and Ohio after A.D.<br />

1000. In addition, both pithouse-like and aboveground<br />

dwellings are evident. There does, however,<br />

seem to be a preference for pithouse-like dwellings<br />

within the Little and Great Miami Valleys. Data on<br />

dwelling size is available for only Killen, and it is not<br />

possible at present to discern a change in dwelling<br />

size between the Late Woodland and the transitional<br />

Late Prehistoric sites.<br />

While the collective settlement pattern (including<br />

the spatial organization of behavior) is more an extension<br />

of the Late Woodland period, aspects of the social<br />

and economic spheres were in a state of change. One<br />

noted change in social space is that played by ritual.<br />

The combination of ritual and social space is different<br />

at Voss, Killen, Blain, Howard Baum, Enos Holmes,<br />

and at some Turpin phase sites. At these sites,<br />

mounds become an integrated component of the<br />

social environment. This is a marked change from the<br />

22 Church and Nass

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!