30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 7<br />

EARLY LATE PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT:<br />

A View From Northcentral Pennsylvania<br />

Christina B. Rieth<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Archaeological investigations in northcentral<br />

Pennsylvania have produced a wealth of information<br />

relating to the early Late Prehistoric (A.D. <strong>700</strong>-1300)<br />

occupation of the region. Derived largely from cultural<br />

resource management excavations, museum and<br />

academic field projects, and advocational “digs,” these<br />

studies have contributed to our understanding of the<br />

use and occupation of both small and large sedentary<br />

settlements (Bressler 1980; Custer et al. 1996:1-54; East<br />

et al. 1988; Garrahan 1990:5-13; Hatch 1980; Jones 1971;<br />

Lucy 1991a:172-179; Lucy and Vanderpoel 1979;<br />

Michaels 1994:28-40; Michaels and Huner 1968; Smith<br />

1977:27-29; Stewart 1994:63-171), the exploitation of the<br />

local environment (Hart and Asch Sidell 1996; Hatch<br />

and Stevenson 1980:140-170; King 1999:18-20; Michaels<br />

and Smith 1967; Shaffer 1998:33-34), and short- and<br />

long-term changes in material culture (Hatch and<br />

Koontz 1983:18-19; Kent et al. 1971:329-330; Lucy 1991;<br />

McCann 1971). In many of these studies, ceramic types<br />

represent important units of analysis used to reconstruct<br />

prehistoric settlement and subsistence strategies.<br />

In northcentral Pennsylvania, the early Late<br />

Prehistoric period is characterized by the Clemson<br />

Island and Owasco ceramic traditions. Similarities<br />

between Clemson Island and Owasco ceramics include<br />

the use of cord-wrapped stick and paddle impressions<br />

on the exterior surface (Hay et al. 1987; Lucy 1959;<br />

McCann 1971), the presence of a flat, slightly outflaring<br />

rim (Schwartz 1985), and the use of both paddle<br />

and anvil, and coiling techniques in ceramic manufacture<br />

(Lucy and McCann 1983:6-8; Lucy and<br />

Vanderpoel 1979; Prezzano 1986; Rieth 1997; Stewart<br />

1994:139). Differences in decorative attributes (e.g.,<br />

presence of nodes and punctates around interior and<br />

exterior rim, use of overstamping on container neck<br />

and body, etc.), preparation of the ceramic paste, and<br />

firing techniques have also been recognized (McCann<br />

1971; Smith, pers. comm. 1987 as cited in Stewart<br />

1994:13).<br />

The spatial distributions of Clemson Island and<br />

Owasco ceramics in northcentral Pennsylvania show<br />

a considerable overlap (Lucy 1959, 1991a; Shaffer<br />

1998:31-32; Stewart 1990). As a result, archaeologists<br />

often consider similarities in decorative and form<br />

attributes to be indicators of interaction and information<br />

exchange between distinct cultural groups<br />

(Garrahan 1990; Lucy 1991a; Ritchie and Funk 1973;<br />

Stewart 1994). Despite similarities in decoration, several<br />

archaeologists have reported differences in the<br />

paste of these containers, suggesting that different<br />

resource deposits may have been exploited by the<br />

manufacturers of these vessels. If the use of different<br />

resources can be demonstrated, such information<br />

would not only signify the use of different resource<br />

procurement zones within a larger settlement system<br />

(Lizee et al. 1995), but would also provide information<br />

about the utility of culture-historic types within<br />

archaeology.<br />

In this chapter, I explore the relationship between<br />

culture-historic types and manufacturing techniques<br />

by comparing the ceramic assemblages from four early<br />

Late Prehistoric sites in northcentral Pennsylvania:<br />

Fisher Farm, Tioga Point Farm, Wells, and St.<br />

Anthony’s. Since these ceramic assemblages exhibit a<br />

high degree of stylistic similarity, trace element analysis<br />

was used to address three questions: (1) Are the<br />

ceramic sherds from these four sites manufactured<br />

from local or nonlocal clays?; (2) Is there a correlation<br />

between culture-historic types and the clays that were<br />

used in the production of these containers?; and (3)<br />

What are the implications for understanding early Late<br />

Prehistoric settlement?<br />

<strong>Northeast</strong> <strong>Subsistence</strong>-<strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: A.D. <strong>700</strong><strong>–1300</strong> by John P. Hart and Christina B. Rieth. New York State Museum<br />

© 2002 by the University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, Albany, New York. All rights reserved.<br />

Chapter 7 Early Late Prehistoric <strong>Settlement</strong>: A View from Northcentral Pennsylvania 135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!