Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 7<br />
EARLY LATE PREHISTORIC SETTLEMENT:<br />
A View From Northcentral Pennsylvania<br />
Christina B. Rieth<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Archaeological investigations in northcentral<br />
Pennsylvania have produced a wealth of information<br />
relating to the early Late Prehistoric (A.D. <strong>700</strong>-1300)<br />
occupation of the region. Derived largely from cultural<br />
resource management excavations, museum and<br />
academic field projects, and advocational “digs,” these<br />
studies have contributed to our understanding of the<br />
use and occupation of both small and large sedentary<br />
settlements (Bressler 1980; Custer et al. 1996:1-54; East<br />
et al. 1988; Garrahan 1990:5-13; Hatch 1980; Jones 1971;<br />
Lucy 1991a:172-179; Lucy and Vanderpoel 1979;<br />
Michaels 1994:28-40; Michaels and Huner 1968; Smith<br />
1977:27-29; Stewart 1994:63-171), the exploitation of the<br />
local environment (Hart and Asch Sidell 1996; Hatch<br />
and Stevenson 1980:140-170; King 1999:18-20; Michaels<br />
and Smith 1967; Shaffer 1998:33-34), and short- and<br />
long-term changes in material culture (Hatch and<br />
Koontz 1983:18-19; Kent et al. 1971:329-330; Lucy 1991;<br />
McCann 1971). In many of these studies, ceramic types<br />
represent important units of analysis used to reconstruct<br />
prehistoric settlement and subsistence strategies.<br />
In northcentral Pennsylvania, the early Late<br />
Prehistoric period is characterized by the Clemson<br />
Island and Owasco ceramic traditions. Similarities<br />
between Clemson Island and Owasco ceramics include<br />
the use of cord-wrapped stick and paddle impressions<br />
on the exterior surface (Hay et al. 1987; Lucy 1959;<br />
McCann 1971), the presence of a flat, slightly outflaring<br />
rim (Schwartz 1985), and the use of both paddle<br />
and anvil, and coiling techniques in ceramic manufacture<br />
(Lucy and McCann 1983:6-8; Lucy and<br />
Vanderpoel 1979; Prezzano 1986; Rieth 1997; Stewart<br />
1994:139). Differences in decorative attributes (e.g.,<br />
presence of nodes and punctates around interior and<br />
exterior rim, use of overstamping on container neck<br />
and body, etc.), preparation of the ceramic paste, and<br />
firing techniques have also been recognized (McCann<br />
1971; Smith, pers. comm. 1987 as cited in Stewart<br />
1994:13).<br />
The spatial distributions of Clemson Island and<br />
Owasco ceramics in northcentral Pennsylvania show<br />
a considerable overlap (Lucy 1959, 1991a; Shaffer<br />
1998:31-32; Stewart 1990). As a result, archaeologists<br />
often consider similarities in decorative and form<br />
attributes to be indicators of interaction and information<br />
exchange between distinct cultural groups<br />
(Garrahan 1990; Lucy 1991a; Ritchie and Funk 1973;<br />
Stewart 1994). Despite similarities in decoration, several<br />
archaeologists have reported differences in the<br />
paste of these containers, suggesting that different<br />
resource deposits may have been exploited by the<br />
manufacturers of these vessels. If the use of different<br />
resources can be demonstrated, such information<br />
would not only signify the use of different resource<br />
procurement zones within a larger settlement system<br />
(Lizee et al. 1995), but would also provide information<br />
about the utility of culture-historic types within<br />
archaeology.<br />
In this chapter, I explore the relationship between<br />
culture-historic types and manufacturing techniques<br />
by comparing the ceramic assemblages from four early<br />
Late Prehistoric sites in northcentral Pennsylvania:<br />
Fisher Farm, Tioga Point Farm, Wells, and St.<br />
Anthony’s. Since these ceramic assemblages exhibit a<br />
high degree of stylistic similarity, trace element analysis<br />
was used to address three questions: (1) Are the<br />
ceramic sherds from these four sites manufactured<br />
from local or nonlocal clays?; (2) Is there a correlation<br />
between culture-historic types and the clays that were<br />
used in the production of these containers?; and (3)<br />
What are the implications for understanding early Late<br />
Prehistoric settlement?<br />
<strong>Northeast</strong> <strong>Subsistence</strong>-<strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: A.D. <strong>700</strong><strong>–1300</strong> by John P. Hart and Christina B. Rieth. New York State Museum<br />
© 2002 by the University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, Albany, New York. All rights reserved.<br />
Chapter 7 Early Late Prehistoric <strong>Settlement</strong>: A View from Northcentral Pennsylvania 135