Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Pennsylvania continued to practice a semisedentary<br />
settlement pattern during this time. Alternatively, warfare<br />
may not have been excessive, allowing prehistoric<br />
groups to move across clan and tribal territories to<br />
gather needed resources.<br />
The Otsego group produced four sherds with one<br />
(16.6 percent) from Fisher Farm and three (50 percent)<br />
from Tioga Point Farm (Table 7.3). Clay samples 1 and<br />
2, which were collected from deposits in Otsego<br />
County, New York, also clustered within this group. All<br />
of the sherds in this group were assigned to Owasco<br />
types and exhibited cordmarked exterior surfaces<br />
overprinted with cord-wrapped stick and paddle<br />
impressions. These sherds are more diverse than those<br />
assigned to the Tioga group, having quartz, flint, grit,<br />
and unidentified crushed-crystalline inclusions. The<br />
temper size was variable, with inclusions ranging from<br />
less than 1-3 mm in size. One container, of the Owasco<br />
Corded Horizontal variety, appeared laminated in<br />
cross-section.<br />
The geographic distance between clay samples 1 and<br />
2 and the Tioga Point Farm site is approximately 80<br />
km, while the distance between these clay samples and<br />
the Fisher Farm site is approximately 120 km. Given<br />
the large distance and the limited number of sherds (21<br />
percent and 7 percent of total sample, respectively), it<br />
seems unlikely that these sherds were manufactured<br />
by the occupants of these sites. They may instead represent<br />
the by-products of reciprocal exchange between<br />
groups residing in the larger Susquehanna Valley.<br />
While the social mechanisms behind such interactions<br />
are currently not understood, ethnohistoric and<br />
archaeological evidence among later Iroquoian groups<br />
suggests that material objects (and by extension, their<br />
contents) may have been regularly exchanged as a<br />
means of promoting alliances and solidarity between<br />
groups (Kuhn and Sempowski 2001; Trigger 1990: 131).<br />
Of the four other groups defined in this study, the<br />
Otsego group appears to be most closely related to the<br />
Tioga Group (Figure 7.4). This is not surprising, since<br />
the sherds in these two clusters were recovered from<br />
sites in adjacent regions, and, with the exception of the<br />
ceramics from the Fisher Farm site, were all recovered<br />
from locations near the north branch of the<br />
Susquehanna River. Differentiation of the Otsego<br />
group from the other four groups is due in part to the<br />
high concentration of zirconium (Zr) found in these<br />
samples. The two clay samples and one of the samples<br />
from the Tioga Point Farm site produced the three highest<br />
concentrations of this element in this study. One possible<br />
explanation for the enrichment of zirconium in<br />
these sherds may relate to the presence of naturally<br />
Table 7.3. Summary of Clay Groups from Sites in North-Central Pennsylvania.<br />
Clay Group Tioga Point Wells St. Anthony’s Fisher Clay Samples Total<br />
Farm Farm (Samples No.)<br />
Clemson Owasco Clemson Owasco Clemson Owasco Clemson Owasco --- ---<br />
Island Island Island Island<br />
Otsego group --- 3 --- --- --- --- --- 1 2(1,2) 6<br />
Upland group --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1(3) 1<br />
Tioga group 2 5 6 3 1 1 9 2 1(4) 30<br />
West Branch group --- --- --- --- 2 --- 2 --- 1(5) 5<br />
Unknown 2 2 --- --- 3 2 --- --- --- 9<br />
Total 4 10 6 3 6 3 11 3 5 51<br />
Chapter 7 Early Late Prehistoric <strong>Settlement</strong>: A View from Northcentral Pennsylvania 145