30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 13<br />

PALEOETHNOBOTANICAL INDICATORS OF SUBSISTENCE<br />

AND SETTLEMENT CHANGE IN THE NORTHEAST<br />

Nancy Asch Sidell<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Early Late Prehistoric subsistence and settlement<br />

changes in the <strong>Northeast</strong> are expressed in archaeobotanical<br />

assemblages as differences in wood charcoal,<br />

nutshell, and seed assemblages through time. There<br />

are changes in proportions of wild and domesticated<br />

plants as well as other indications of changes in plant<br />

communities. Interpretation of differences between<br />

regions must take into account inherent differences in<br />

the native vegetation and how that vegetation is likely<br />

to be affected by human activities, or anthropogenesis.<br />

Reviewing the first comprehensive summary of<br />

paleoethnobotany in the <strong>Northeast</strong>, Crawford (1999)<br />

observed that none of the papers had addressed the<br />

topic of anthropogenesis. To correct that deficiency,<br />

this chapter will focus on anthropogenesis using data<br />

on plant remains accumulated from quantitative<br />

analysis of Archaic through Contact period (ca. 4400<br />

B.C.-A.D. 1760) sites in Maine, New York,<br />

Connecticut, and Pennsylvania, concentrating on the<br />

period of initial agriculture, ca. A.D. 750-1300.<br />

In 1964, Yarnell’s landmark study of aboriginal<br />

influences on the distribution, habitat, and genetic<br />

variation of plants in the upper Great Lakes region<br />

provided a baseline for later paleoecological work.<br />

Based upon the ethnobotanical literature, he estimated<br />

that Indians made use of at least 20 percent of the<br />

plant species that grew in the area (Yarnell 1964).<br />

Minnis (1978) demonstrated the potential for using<br />

macroplant remains from archaeological contexts as a<br />

relative measure of vegetational disturbance resulting<br />

from human activity in southwestern New Mexico.<br />

Minnis noted that all agricultural systems share a similar<br />

general model for the effects on local vegetation,<br />

with three stages in the cycle of disturbance. First, the<br />

pristine vegetation is cleared. Second, a less diverse<br />

ecosystem of cultivated fields must be maintained.<br />

Plants adapted to disturbed habitats thrive in the fields<br />

and in some cases are encouraged or tolerated because<br />

of their economic potential. And third, after abandonment,<br />

a successional cycle is set in motion. Minnis used<br />

wood charcoal and seeds as indicators of agricultural<br />

disturbance. The wood charcoal assemblage revealed a<br />

reduction of floodplain species during the population<br />

peak in the Classic Mimbres period because of the<br />

location of fields in the floodplain. With increased agriculture,<br />

the effect on archaeological seeds was an<br />

increase in weed species adapted to disturbed soils.<br />

Yarnell (1984), in his study of the Late Archaic<br />

McIntyre site from southern Ontario, grouped food<br />

plants according to the biotic community in which they<br />

would most likely be collected. Indicating degree of<br />

disturbance on a scale of 1 to 4, from most disrupted to<br />

most mature, he characterized habitats as (1) open<br />

degraded; (2) clearings and thickets; (3) open woods; or<br />

(4) mature forest. At McIntyre, most of the plant foods<br />

came from open woods and clearings, including the<br />

borders or intermediate zone between the two types of<br />

communities. He envisioned a site layout that was similar<br />

to the Algonquin summer camps he observed in<br />

western Quebec during 1964 to 1979:<br />

Typically, these people occupy sizeable clearings<br />

directly on lake shores. One does not live in<br />

the forest during the late spring and summer<br />

because of the insufferable hordes of black flies<br />

and mosquitoes. It is essential to have the benefit<br />

of any available breeze and the desiccating sunshine<br />

which are more vital to comfort than is<br />

shade. Generally, there is not much woody vegetation<br />

directly on the site, especially in the activity<br />

areas. There are various forbs and grasses but<br />

few trees, though some work areas are shaded.<br />

<strong>Northeast</strong> <strong>Subsistence</strong>-<strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: A.D. <strong>700</strong><strong>–1300</strong> by John P. Hart and Christina B. Rieth. New York State Museum<br />

© 2002 by the University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, Albany, New York. All rights reserved.<br />

Chapter 13 Paleoethnobotanical Indicators of <strong>Subsistence</strong> and <strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong> in the <strong>Northeast</strong> 241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!