30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3.12. Range of floor areas for dwellings at Fort Hill.<br />

which accounts for a greater proportion than the combined<br />

total dwelling floor areas. This space is created<br />

because the palisade line deviates along its length in<br />

its distance to the outer edge of the house ring. As<br />

noted earlier, the palisade line was built largely along<br />

the edge of the summit of Fort Hill, perhaps to give<br />

the village a larger “apparent” size and deter potentially<br />

hostile groups. However, the palisade was not<br />

constructed solely following defensive guidelines,<br />

since the eastern side of the palisade was not extended<br />

along the narrow edge of the summit, but rather,<br />

more closely paralleled the outer edge of the house<br />

ring. Defensive considerations were, apparently, balanced<br />

against the villager’s desire to adhere to the<br />

geometric model(s) used to plan their settlement. It<br />

should also be noted that, from a labor-management<br />

perspective, a palisade that paralleled the house ring<br />

was more efficient to construct than one that did not.<br />

The remaining space at Fort Hill II was between<br />

adjacent dwellings and again, dwelling spacing is<br />

used as a proxy measure. Since the dwellings in Fort<br />

Hill II were arrayed as a single row around the central<br />

plaza, the distance between a dwelling and the two<br />

dwellings on either side of it corresponded in most<br />

cases to its first and second nearest neighbors. The<br />

distance between a dwelling and its first “adjacent”<br />

neighbor ranged from 0.7 meters to 5.2 meters, while<br />

the distance to its second “adjacent” neighbor ranged<br />

from 1.4 meters to 18.8 meters (Table 3.3). With two<br />

exceptions, dwellings were usually greater than 1.5<br />

meters from their nearest neighbor and not more than<br />

3.1 meters from their second adjacent neighbor. The<br />

first exception is the spacing between Houses 56 and<br />

57, which were located 18.8 meters apart, on either<br />

side of the entrance to the village component. The second<br />

exception is between Houses 60 and 61, located in<br />

the southeastern section of the village component,<br />

which were 12.7 meters apart. These two gaps in the<br />

house ring create a spatially discrete arc of dwellings,<br />

or wedge, that might have represented a localized residential<br />

corporate group, perhaps in the form of a lineage<br />

segment or clan. Further analysis will be<br />

required to evaluate whether there are any other less<br />

obvious but still significant differences in spacing<br />

between other dwellings that might have had some<br />

social and/or economic significance.<br />

62 Means

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!