Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Area 2: Saint John Drainage (see Figure 17.2)<br />
In historic times, the Saint John drainage, along with<br />
the Tobique and Témiscouata areas up to the St.<br />
Lawrence River, were major portions of the Maliseet<br />
territory (Erickson 1978:124). Archaeological research<br />
in the New Brunswick portion of this area has focussed<br />
on the confluence of the Tobique and Saint John Rivers,<br />
the Lakes Region, and the mouth of the Saint John<br />
River. Moorehead (1922:233-236) spent two weeks on<br />
the upper reaches of the Saint John River during his<br />
1914 expedition in search of “Red Paint” sites. He tested<br />
several sites between Edmonston and Eel River, and<br />
sank several hundred test pits for a 4 km radius about<br />
the mouth of the Tobique River. After Moorehead, the<br />
upper Saint John River area was left primarily to local<br />
avocational archaeologists (e.g., Adney 1933;<br />
Bradstreet 1996; Clarke 1968) with limited professional<br />
survey and excavation work (Allen 1975, 1976;<br />
Buchanan 1989; Ferguson 1982; Sanger 1967, 1971a;<br />
Stoddard 1950:74-79; Turnbull 1990). In 1990 there were<br />
only 22 sites known from the Tobique region, yet they<br />
indicated a long prehistoric sequence (Turnbull<br />
1990:25). In 1993 the Tobique First Nations community<br />
sponsored fieldwork at the Bernard site with the help<br />
of David Keenlyside, Curator for Atlantic Archaeology,<br />
Archaeological Survey of Canada.<br />
In the Lakes Region, along the central portion of the<br />
Saint John River, a limited amount of survey and<br />
excavation work was conducted during the late nineteenth<br />
century (Bailey 1887; Kain 1902; Matthew 1896,<br />
1900). Recent archaeological interest began in the<br />
1960s with Pearson’s (1968a) survey, Davis’s (1971)<br />
analysis of ceramics from the Key Hole site, and<br />
Sanger’s (1971b, 1972) excavation of a Late Archaic<br />
cemetery at Cow Point. Subsequent survey work at<br />
Grand Lake (Turnbull 1975) led to excavations at the<br />
Fulton Island site (Foulkes 1981). The recent Jemseg<br />
Crossing Archaeological Project was a salvage operation<br />
at the area of impact for the proposed crossing of<br />
the Trans Canada Highway at Jemseg (Blair 1997a,<br />
1997b, 1998). The nearby Meadows site was also<br />
recently excavated (Varley 1999:43).<br />
A series of surveys in the lower Saint John River<br />
area (Burley 1975; Fisher 1964, 1965; Turnbull 1974a)<br />
followed Harper’s (1956) excavation of a site at<br />
Portland Point (also see Harper 1954), but no other<br />
major excavations have been undertaken (Jeandron<br />
1996). Unfortunately, there appears to be little surviving<br />
evidence of prehistoric occupation at the<br />
mouth of the Saint John River (Burley 1975). This area<br />
has been heavily impacted by modern construction<br />
activities. However, remnants of sites at Portland<br />
Point, Marble Cove, and Bentley Street may yet provide<br />
a glimpse of Late Prehistoric settlement patterns.<br />
The Marble Cove site sits at the end of an<br />
important portage route and Late Archaic remains<br />
link this site with the sites at Portland Point and Cow<br />
Point (Burley 1975:37-38). Recent testing at the<br />
Bentley Street site has revealed a prehistoric occupation<br />
dating back at least 3,000 years (Allen 1998).<br />
Snow (1980) was the first author to give detailed<br />
consideration of prehistoric settlement and subsistence<br />
patterning on the Saint John River. He suggests<br />
that ancestral Maliseet lived in semipermanent villages<br />
located on saltwater. These villages could range<br />
as far north as the Lakes Region, which sits at the<br />
head of tide for the Saint John River. Snow’s (1980:45)<br />
model involves logistical movements of small bands<br />
from these villages into upstream forests in the winter<br />
and coastal (residential) encampments in the late<br />
spring and summer as important resources became<br />
available. According to Snow (1980:47), winter campsites<br />
were scattered along the shores of the river and<br />
its ponds, lakes, and most tributaries, and summer<br />
campsites were found on the coast. Snow feels that<br />
the European fur trade had little effect on the<br />
Maliseet, since they followed a relatively mobile and<br />
diffuse settlement-subsistence pattern. He also suggests<br />
that whatever incentive there was to adopt horticulture<br />
disappeared with the intensification of the<br />
fur trade (Snow 1980:46). Thus, semipermanent<br />
villages, regular seasonal scheduling, and a dense<br />
population led to development of a tribal sociopolitical<br />
system for the Maliseet (Snow 1980:48). According<br />
to David Sanger (1998, pers. comm.), Snow’s model<br />
appears to be based primarily on Speck’s (1940) characterization<br />
of the Penobscot in Maine, which he<br />
applies wholesale to the Saint John River region without<br />
adequate confirmation from archaeological evidence<br />
(also see Sanger 1986).<br />
In a recent detailed study of the major lithic source<br />
areas at Témiscouata, Tobique, and Munsungun,<br />
Burke (2000) reviewed the archaeological evidence for<br />
settlement and subsistence patterning for the interior<br />
of the Saint John River waterway. He considered three<br />
possible scenarios, namely, that the population of the<br />
waterway consisted of (1) two distinct groups with<br />
little interaction; (2) two distinct groups with<br />
considerable interaction and fluid group membership;<br />
or (3) a coastal group occupying the interior on a seasonal<br />
basis (Burke 2000:164). He eventually settled on<br />
334 Deal