30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 9.8. Nutshell composition.<br />

the striking difference in the proportion of cob fragments<br />

may also indicate that maize was cultivated at<br />

Thomas/Luckey but not at Broome Tech. This would<br />

particularly be the case if Broome Tech was only seasonally<br />

occupied and did not represent a village or<br />

hamlet, as is the case for Thomas/Luckey. If Broome<br />

Tech was only seasonally utilized, then detached maize<br />

kernels may have been transported to the site from<br />

another location.<br />

Earlier it was noted that, based on percentage composition,<br />

mast products assumed a greater economic<br />

role at Broome Tech when compared to<br />

Thomas/Luckey. In an apparent contradiction, nutshell<br />

indices that divide total nutshell by total carbon<br />

weight indicate that the density of nutshell at<br />

Thomas/Luckey is 12.6, 4 times greater than the 3.0<br />

ratio at Broome Tech (Table 9.5). However, the greater<br />

relative contribution of mast products at Broome Tech<br />

is masked by the relatively greater abundance of all<br />

non-wood plants at Thomas/Luckey. Examination of<br />

the compositions of the nutshell assemblage suggests<br />

that butternut (63 percent) was the most important<br />

mast resource at Broome Tech, followed by hickory,<br />

representing 24 percent of the assemblage (Figure 9.8).<br />

At Thomas/Luckey the pattern is reversed, with hickory<br />

(47 percent) the favored nut and butternut representing<br />

nearly one-third of the mast remains. Acorn<br />

(Quercus spp.) shells are important, but minor, constituents<br />

accounting for 10 and 7 percent of the<br />

Thomas/Luckey and Broome Tech nutshell, respectively.<br />

Trace amounts (less than 1 percent) of bitternut<br />

hickory (Carya cordiformus) and hazelnut (Sorylus sp.)<br />

were recovered from Broome Tech, but were absent<br />

from Thomas/Luckey.<br />

The recovery of relatively large amounts of butternut<br />

shell from both sites is intriguing, given that butternut<br />

is believed to have been only a minor constituent<br />

of the forest environment in the Upper<br />

Susquehanna Valley (Asch Sidell 1999; Braun 1950;<br />

Versaggi 1987:93). It is intriguing that less than 1 percent<br />

of the wood charcoal recovered from Broome Tech<br />

was identified as butternut (Asch Sidell 1999) 7 , yet<br />

butternut mast was clearly an important high-fat and<br />

high-calorie food targeted by the residents of these two<br />

182 Knapp

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!