30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Diametric, concentric, and circumferential models<br />

can operate simultaneously or sequentially and on the<br />

same or different levels to influence the layout of a<br />

ring-shaped village from its initial establishment and<br />

throughout its occupational history. A general “huband-spoke”<br />

model has been developed that combines<br />

facets of these three models (Figure 3.6). The model’s<br />

name was inspired by one researcher’s observation<br />

that the Central Brazilian village of Ponto “. . . looks<br />

like a huge wheel, with the plaza at the hub and the<br />

spokes [paths] radiating to the houses which are on<br />

the circumference” (James 1949:27). In the hub-andspoke<br />

model, the hub represents the central and<br />

sacred plaza and the spokes radiate out from the center<br />

to the periphery, which is the profane and domestic<br />

area. The spokes divide the periphery into a number<br />

of “wedges,” thus highlighting the existence of a<br />

circumferential model. The wedges can combine in<br />

different ways and on different levels as groups and<br />

subgroups of differing sizes form, depending on the<br />

strength of social, economic, and political ties. The<br />

operation of a diametric model is evident if two major<br />

wedge groupings are present, which may include a<br />

variable number of subgroupings. The hub-andspoke<br />

model is an heuristic construct designed to<br />

emphasize that the spatial layout of a village site must<br />

be examined in terms of diametric, concentric, and<br />

circumferential patterning.<br />

Villages where households were fairly autonomous<br />

or linked informally are expected to have evenly<br />

spaced dwellings (see Nass 1995) and to have a fairly<br />

even distribution of pit features among the dwellings.<br />

Burial features, when present, will not form discrete<br />

clusters. Such a village would likely not have had a<br />

large enough population to have necessitated the<br />

development of suprahousehold organization. More<br />

formal economic, social, and political links between<br />

groups of households are inferable where dwellings<br />

are unevenly spaced and where dwelling size is more<br />

variable. Dwellings may form clusters within the village<br />

that represent discrete residential corporate<br />

groups that are linked along kin lines, as well as economic<br />

and political considerations. The number of<br />

dwellings, their size, and arrangement within such a<br />

cluster may suggest its social nature and measure its<br />

differential economic success compared to other such<br />

clusters. The presence of permanent, specialized, and<br />

bounded cemeteries within a village would probably<br />

indicate the presence of a corporate group structure in<br />

the form of a lineal descent system (Goldstein<br />

1981:61). If the overall pattern of dwellings around a<br />

house ring is segmented into wedges (Dunnell 1983),<br />

each wedge could represent a different, lineage-based<br />

descent group or clan.<br />

SETTLEMENT AND SUBSISTENCE<br />

OVERVIEW FOR THE ALLEGHENY<br />

MOUNTAINS REGION OF THE LOWER<br />

UPPER OHIO RIVER BASIN<br />

Figure 3.6. “Hub-and-spoke” model of a ringshaped<br />

village settlement.<br />

The majority of archaeological investigations in the<br />

Allegheny Mountains region of the Lower Upper<br />

Ohio River basin have occurred in an area coterminous<br />

with Somerset County, Pennsylvania, that is<br />

drained by the Youghiogheny and Casselman Rivers,<br />

which form a portion of the headwaters of the Ohio<br />

River Drainage system (Augustine 1938a:6; Flint<br />

1965:14; Wall 1981:3). The Raystown Branch of the<br />

Juniata River, which is part of the Susquehanna River<br />

drainage, originates in Somerset County, as do several<br />

headwaters of the Potomac River (Flint 1965:14).<br />

This region’s geographic placement suggests that it<br />

Chapter 3 Modeling Village Community Organization Using Data From the Somerset County Relief Excavations 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!