30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 2.15. Map of households within the Late Prehistoric Sunwatch Village site (taken from Nass 1987).<br />

these two trends resulted in the appearance of<br />

planned, nucleated communities at various locations<br />

across the central Ohio Valley. The number of these<br />

sites and their duration is still unclear. However, the<br />

speed and duration of nucleation would be dependent<br />

upon the strength of the benefits afforded by this<br />

strategy. Once concentrated, interhousehold economic<br />

cooperation would have been essential for the vitality<br />

of this settlement arrangement, especially if a tactic<br />

was interhousehold sharing of grown resources. With a<br />

massed population, the farming of cultigens would<br />

have shifted from individual household production to<br />

aggregated monocrop fields outside the boundaries of<br />

the community. However, all farmers are cognizant of<br />

the fact that farming (even of native cultigens) carries<br />

with it an uncertainty and that final outcomes are not<br />

predictable. During periods of high ranking resource<br />

shortages, fallback resources, such as low ranking wild<br />

plants and animals, were exploited provided they<br />

occurred in the necessary densities, and the population<br />

possessed the necessary logistics to collect, process,<br />

and transport them in sufficient quantities. These<br />

nucleated settlements were also at risk in terms of<br />

pathogens and strained social relations. It is still<br />

unclear whether migration or social dispersion was a<br />

tactic to buffer localized resource shortages.<br />

For reasons still unclear, the nucleated settlement<br />

pattern of the early Late Woodland in West Virginia,<br />

Ohio, and Kentucky disappears almost as quickly as<br />

it materialized. <strong>Settlement</strong> data based on site survey<br />

and excavation have documented the existence of<br />

smaller, dispersed concentrations of cultural remains<br />

across the central Ohio Valley, implying a return to a<br />

dispersed household settlement pattern more reminiscent<br />

of the Middle Woodland (Jefferies and Shott 1992;<br />

Seeman 1992b). This change in settlement strategy<br />

Chapter 2 Central Ohio Valley During the Late Prehistoric Period: Subsistance-<strong>Settlement</strong> Systems’ Responses to Risk 35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!