Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
confluence with the Susquehanna River. The site, located<br />
approximately 300 m north of the current river<br />
channel, falls on an extensive peninsular section of<br />
floodplain created by a large meander. Periodic flooding<br />
of the river flats deposited deep, well-drained fine<br />
sandy loams (USDA 1973:84). This meander plain lies<br />
at an elevation between 810 and 820 ft asl. Despite the<br />
general levelness of the floodplain, cross-cutting<br />
Thomas/Luckey in an east-west direction is a series of<br />
swales and flat ridges. Moving away from the floodplain,<br />
the southern bluffs climb to over 1,<strong>700</strong> ft asl,<br />
while those to the north rise to greater than 1,500 ft asl.<br />
The geology and drainage patterns of the Chemung<br />
Valley influence the distribution of local forest types.<br />
Distinctive forests are mapped onto the active floodplain<br />
and the dramatically rising bluffs of the<br />
Chemung River, producing a forest contact setting.<br />
Thomas/Luckey falls in a fingerlike northward extension<br />
of the Oak and Oak-Chestnut Forest (Braun<br />
1950:233-242, 408). Chestnut, red oak, and white oak<br />
are the primary trees composing this forest; also present,<br />
but in fewer numbers, are hickory, sugar maple,<br />
hemlock, tulip, and beech. These Southern Forest projections<br />
follow major drainage lines, and are surrounded<br />
by the upland Hemlock-White Pine-Northern<br />
Hardwoods Forest dominated by sugar maple, beech,<br />
yellow birch, hemlock, and white pine (Braun<br />
1950:393-410).<br />
Excavations conducted by PAF and Binghamton<br />
University’s Field School in 1994 completely uncovered<br />
a single longhouse and 72 features (Knapp<br />
1996). 1 Cooking and/or heating features documented<br />
at Thomas/Luckey include hearths and earth ovens.<br />
Although each feature type may serve to cook food,<br />
each implies a distinctive cooking technology.<br />
Cooking hearths involve the use of an open-fire kindled<br />
on the ground surface or within relatively shallow<br />
basins. In contrast, earth ovens are typically<br />
deeper cooking features<br />
. . . in which preheated rocks were used as a<br />
source of heat. Food would be placed amidst layers<br />
of grass, vegetation, and earth piled atop the<br />
oven. Cooking would take place slowly; presumably,<br />
the heat produced in such a context was not<br />
as intense as that produced by an open fire. (Stahl<br />
1985:122)<br />
Two classes of storage features were identified at<br />
Thomas/Luckey based on size, shape, and presumed<br />
functional distinctions. Large deep-storage features,<br />
with a volume greater than 0.3 cu. m, are believed to<br />
have served as food-storage receptacles, while small<br />
(less than 0.3 cu. m), relatively shallow storage pits<br />
may have served as personal caches. The 0.3 cu. m<br />
threshold was arrived at from other research in the<br />
Eastern Woodlands (Stahl 1985:135) and empirically by<br />
comparing Thomas/Luckey feature volumes to ratios<br />
of pit length/depth (Knapp 1996:125). Increasing pit<br />
size while minimizing surface-area-to-volume ratio<br />
enhances preservation of stored grains (DeBoer 1988:3;<br />
Reynolds 1977:127). Therefore, large deep pits with relatively<br />
narrow openings function to more effectively<br />
preserve grain.<br />
Nine botanical samples derived from feature contexts<br />
at Thomas/Luckey have been radiocarbon-dated<br />
(Table 9.1). In the initial site report, five wood charcoal<br />
samples were dated using the standard radiocarbon<br />
method, and provided mixed results (Knapp 1996).<br />
The calibrated intercepts for these standard dates range<br />
from A.D. 662-1439, with the maximum calibrated 2σ<br />
range covering more than a millennium (A.D. 561-<br />
1622). Several of these dates were believed to be incompatible<br />
with the associated pottery types (Knapp 1996).<br />
Recently, a series of four AMS dates on maize and bean<br />
remains have clarified the age of Thomas/Luckey by<br />
avoiding some of the problems associated with standard<br />
radiometric dating of wood samples. The calibrated<br />
AMS intercepts display a much tighter range of<br />
A.D. 1292-1434, with the three maize dates forming a<br />
very tight cluster between A.D. 1409 and 1434. The<br />
maximum AMS 2σ range includes A.D. 1260-1483. The<br />
probabilistic nature of the radiocarbon technique tends<br />
to disperse dates, often creating a chronological range<br />
that overestimates a site’s occupation length (Asch and<br />
Brown 1990; Ottaway 1987; Shott 1992). Given this, and<br />
setting aside the problematic wood dates, it appears<br />
that Thomas/Luckey most likely dates between A.D.<br />
1300 and 1450.<br />
THE BROOME TECH SITE<br />
Broome Tech (SUBi-1005) is a stratified multicomponent<br />
site located on the west bank of the Chenango<br />
River, approximately 5 km from its confluence with the<br />
Susquehanna River (Figure 9.3). Excavations conducted<br />
by PAF in 1997 and 1998 documented four distinct<br />
occupations, including two Transitional, one Middle<br />
Woodland, and one Late Prehistoric (Knapp 1998;<br />
Versaggi and Knapp 2000). The Chenango River also<br />
falls in the glaciated portion of the Appalachian<br />
Plateau. The site lies approximately 85 m west of the<br />
former location of the main river channel prior to<br />
rechanneling associated with the construction of<br />
Chapter 9 Pits, Plants, and Place: Recognizing Late Prehistoric <strong>Subsistence</strong> and <strong>Settlement</strong> Diversity in the Upper Susquehanna Drainage 171