Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 17<br />
ABORIGINAL LAND AND RESOURCE USE<br />
IN NEW BRUNSWICK DURING THE LATE PREHISTORIC<br />
AND EARLY CONTACT PERIODS<br />
Michael Deal<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
This chapter developed from a legal background<br />
paper relating to aboriginal land claims in the province<br />
of New Brunswick (Deal 1998), which along with Nova<br />
Scotia and Prince Edward Island, make up the<br />
Canadian Maritime Provinces. While the information<br />
was originally used to illustrate traditional ties to the<br />
landscape and resources for establishing aboriginal<br />
land and resource rights (e.g., Aronson 1997), it is also<br />
valuable to archaeologists who wish to understand the<br />
ecological context of local prehistoric societies and<br />
related mobility strategies. Land use patterns are<br />
equated here with patterns of archaeological settlement<br />
(site) distribution and seasonality, while resource<br />
use relates to the natural resources that formed the<br />
basis of prehistoric technologies and subsistence practices.<br />
The Late Prehistoric and Protohistoric aboriginal<br />
inhabitants of New Brunswick were foraging peoples<br />
(hunter-gatherers) who followed complex mobility<br />
patterns according to changing socioeconomic conditions.<br />
According to Kelly (1992:43-44), forager mobility,<br />
or the periodic movements of people across the landscape,<br />
is influenced by a number of factors, including<br />
subsistence, level of food storage, trade, territoriality,<br />
social and gender inequalities, work patterns, demography,<br />
and cultural perceptions. Nash (1997) even associates<br />
the long-term settlement and subsistence patterns<br />
of the indigenous peoples of the region with the<br />
three archetypal landscapes of glacial wasteland, primordial<br />
sea, and forest labyrinth, with the latter being<br />
primarily associated with the Woodland period.<br />
Following Binford (1980), a distinction is made here<br />
between residential mobility and logistical mobility.<br />
The former relates to the movement of all members of<br />
a campsite or village from one location to another,<br />
while the latter involves the movement of small<br />
groups or individuals to and from residential sites<br />
(Kelly 1983:278). In logistical terms, mobility can<br />
involve short trips for general foraging, specific tasks,<br />
or resource monitoring. The discussion below begins<br />
with a review of archaeological evidence of aboriginal<br />
resource use in the province, followed by an<br />
assessment of current models of aboriginal settlement<br />
and resource use. The major archaeological sites discussed<br />
below are found on the map in Figure 17.1.<br />
Archaeologists working in the Maritime Provinces<br />
generally agree that there was a largely unbroken cultural<br />
sequence for the 1,500 year span before<br />
European contact (ca. 2000-500 B.P.). In terms of the<br />
regional chronology, this includes the Middle and<br />
Late Woodland and Protohistoric periods (see Table<br />
17.1). While Middle and Late occupations can sometimes<br />
be distinguished in coastal shell midden sites<br />
(Black, this volume), this is not always possible at<br />
interior sites, which tend to have compressed stratigraphy<br />
and occupation sequences from Late Archaic to<br />
historic times. In the archaeological literature, the<br />
Middle and Late Woodland peoples are generally<br />
treated as a cultural continuum, distinguished by<br />
minor changes in technology, and historic ethnic divisions<br />
are often projected back to the Middle<br />
Woodland period (e.g., the ancestral Mik’maq,<br />
Maliseet, and Passamaquoddy). Middle and Late<br />
manifestations of Woodland culture are often distinguished<br />
on stylistic fads in ceramic designs, and<br />
assigned to specific Ceramic periods (CP1-7; after<br />
Petersen and Sanger 1991). Based on our current<br />
understanding of local prehistory, the “early Late<br />
Prehistoric (A.D. <strong>700</strong>-1300)” designation used elsewhere<br />
in this volume is not easily identified as a distinctive<br />
developmental period. However, ongoing<br />
research does suggest a trend from Middle to Late<br />
Woodland times toward the exploitation of a wider<br />
<strong>Northeast</strong> <strong>Subsistence</strong>-<strong>Settlement</strong> <strong>Change</strong>: A.D. <strong>700</strong><strong>–1300</strong> by John P. Hart and Christina B. Rieth. New York State Museum<br />
© 2002 by the University of the State of New York, The State Education Department, Albany, New York. All rights reserved.<br />
Chapter 17 Aboriginal Land and Resource Use in New Brunswick During the Late Prehistoric and Early Contact Periods 321