Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
were noted), which also could not be identified to<br />
species, but based on size and configuration, are<br />
believed to represent one or more of the small anadromous<br />
species. Floral remains included pin-cherry<br />
(Prunus pensylvanica), carbonized nutshell (species not<br />
identified), and unidentified seeds. Fish vertebrae<br />
were the most commonly recovered food remain that<br />
could be assigned to the Middle Woodland period,<br />
while several pre-Middle Woodland features produced<br />
seeds tentatively identified as chenopodium.<br />
The location of the site downstream from the falls<br />
suggested fish were harvested with the use of a weir,<br />
set net, or baskets. Net sinkers, fishhooks, gorges, leisters,<br />
and other artifacts traditionally considered to be<br />
indicative of a fishing orientation were infrequent or<br />
nonexistent. The absence of large storage pits as well<br />
as any quantity of mammalian bone, and the relatively<br />
restricted variety of artifact forms and the small number<br />
of projectile points in comparison to other categories<br />
of chipped stone tools, are evidence for a limited-purpose<br />
occupation with a low emphasis on the<br />
hunting of land animals. Still, the very dark and<br />
organically rich soils of the features and living floors,<br />
with relatively high content of phosphorus, magnesium,<br />
and calcium, argue for the presence of decomposed<br />
food remains. (For a more complete discussion,<br />
see Brumbach 1978:138-143.) Fish harvesting and processing<br />
would have deposited large accumulations of<br />
refuse onto the site, and could have accounted for the<br />
soil characteristics.<br />
ECOLOGICAL CONTEXTS<br />
FOR A MIDDLE WOODLAND FISHING<br />
ECONOMY ALONG THE UPPER HUDSON<br />
Schuylerville’s location, like other sites in the upper<br />
Hudson River drainage (see Funk 1976), was likely to<br />
have been selected because it offered easy access to<br />
migratory fish. Although fish can be taken from<br />
almost any place along rivers or within lakes, they are<br />
most readily taken in large numbers at natural<br />
obstructions such as falls, shallows, or reefs (Rostlund<br />
1952). These features function like man-made traps,<br />
since they impede the progress of the migrating fish<br />
that tend to mill around in the pools before ascending<br />
upriver. Located adjacent to a shallows or fording<br />
place and immediately downstream from the first of a<br />
set of falls on Fish Creek, the site is positioned for harvesting<br />
migratory fish after they enter the smaller<br />
creek from the Hudson River but before they begin to<br />
ascend the falls.<br />
The Fish Population<br />
According to several nineteenth century documents,<br />
Fish Creek received its name “ . . . because of<br />
the myriads of herrings which used to swarm up<br />
through it in the spring of the year into [Saratoga<br />
Lake]; and secondly because of the intensive fish<br />
weirs which the Indians constructed at the outlet of<br />
the lake for catching herring” (Brandow 1900:8). Also,<br />
“It is a well known fact that in Colonial times, before<br />
the mills and dams were erected at Schuylerville by<br />
Gen. P. Schuyler in 1760, herring and shad in<br />
immense schools were in the habit of running up the<br />
Hudson in the spring into Fish Creek (hence the<br />
name) and thence through Lake Saratoga and the<br />
Kayaderosseras even to Rock City Falls” (Stone<br />
1880:35-36, quoted in Ritchie 1958:11).<br />
While few fish species do not perform some kind of<br />
migration during part of their life cycle (Nikolsky<br />
1963:231), the anadromous fish (and catadromous eel,<br />
which reverses the direction of migration) are best<br />
known for their migrations, which may bring them<br />
far inland in search of suitable spawning grounds.<br />
Anadromous fish do most of their growing at sea,<br />
where food supplies are greater, and when mature<br />
return to fresh or brackish water, where spawning<br />
and nursery grounds are more protected. This pattern<br />
becomes more marked in the northerly latitudes<br />
because of the cooler environment. Here, primary<br />
productivity of lakes and rivers is not high, especially<br />
during the colder months, and the ability of these<br />
lakes to support resident fish populations is limited<br />
(Schalk 1977:211). The movement of fish into inland<br />
waters for spawning, at which time most anadromous<br />
species do not feed, brings large numbers of fish into<br />
an environment suitable for reproduction although<br />
not for year-round support. Seasonal changes in<br />
water temperature trigger both the inland migrations<br />
and spawning. Since the fish do most of their feeding<br />
in the marine ecosystem, the migrations represent an<br />
energy “bonus” to the interior. By coordinating their<br />
own patterns of mobility and aggregation with those<br />
of the fish species, human populations can benefit<br />
from this natural abundance. The importance of the<br />
fish to the prehorticultural subsistence system, therefore,<br />
lies not only in their abundance, but also in their<br />
spatial and temporal predictability.<br />
The major species involved in the Hudson River<br />
fishery include two species of sturgeon of the family<br />
Acipenseridae (the short-nosed sturgeon, Acipenser<br />
brevirostrum, and the common or sea sturgeon, A.<br />
oxrhynchus, also classified as A. sturio), several of the<br />
232 Brumbach and Bender