30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 3.2. Descriptive Statistics for Floor Area (square meters) of Dwellings at Fort Hill<br />

Statistic Occupation I Occupation II<br />

Range 15.29 - 67.07 21.24 - 68.45<br />

Mean 26.90 38.69<br />

Median 25.97 40.48<br />

Standard Deviation 9.82 11.52<br />

between dwellings was used as a proxy measure for<br />

characterizing the size and distribution of these smaller<br />

spaces. The spacing between dwellings can also be<br />

used as an indicator of the degree of crowding within<br />

a village settlement and of the strength of social and<br />

economic ties between households. The distances<br />

between each dwelling and its first “adjacent” neighbor<br />

were quite variable, ranging from 0.2 meters to 3.2<br />

meters, though the majority of dwellings were within<br />

1.5 meters of one another (Table 3.3). There is also considerable<br />

variation in the distance between each<br />

dwelling and its second “adjacent” neighbor, ranging<br />

from 0.5 to 7 meters, and its third “adjacent” neighbor,<br />

ranging from 1.5 to 11.6 meters. However, these three<br />

distance measures do not show a proportionate<br />

increase relative to each dwelling. That is, the distance<br />

of each individual dwelling to its second “adjacent”<br />

neighbor sometimes showed a slight increase over the<br />

distance to its first “adjacent” neighbor or was much<br />

greater. A similar pattern holds true for the distance<br />

between an individual dwelling and its third “adjacent”<br />

neighbor. Most dwellings within Fort Hill I were<br />

generally, but not always, very close to at least one<br />

other dwelling. Several households intentionally built<br />

their dwellings closer to one another than absolutely<br />

required by the limited amount of available occupational<br />

space, probably forming cooperative economic<br />

and social groups that manifested along kin lines. The<br />

degree of crowding within Fort Hill I is a relative measure<br />

best assessed in comparison to Fort Hill II.<br />

Fort Hill II. Since part of Fort Hill II has eroded<br />

away, the outer palisade line was extrapolated to estimate<br />

its total maximum settlement area at 13,032<br />

square meters. The single largest space within Fort Hill<br />

II was the plaza, which, at 6883.6 square meters,<br />

accounted for 53 percent of the total settlement area.<br />

The geometric center of the plaza was only 7.6 meters<br />

from the geometric center of the village component<br />

(Table 3.1). This distance is quite small relative to the<br />

maximum dimensions of both the plaza, 98.3 meters by<br />

85.7 meters, and the entire village component, 135.5<br />

meters by 121.8 meters. A possible ceremonial post that<br />

was located within Fort Hill I’s plaza and 5 meters<br />

from its center was only 2.7 meters from the center of<br />

Fort Hill II’s plaza, supporting Cresson’s (1942:23-24)<br />

assertion that this feature was associated with Fort<br />

Hill II.<br />

In Fort Hill II, the total maximum dwelling floor<br />

area of 1241.4 square meters was estimated, because<br />

two dwellings were partly destroyed by erosion and<br />

one dwelling was partly obliterated due to modern<br />

farming practices. This represented approximately 10<br />

percent of the total settlement area. Dwellings ranged<br />

in floor area from 21.2 square meters to 68.5 square<br />

meters, with all but two dwellings having a floor area<br />

less than 53.1 square meters (Table 3.2) (Figure 3.12).<br />

Dwelling floor area increased almost continuously<br />

from the smallest dwelling to the third largest<br />

dwelling, with the exception of a slight break at<br />

around 30.7 square meters. Pronounced abrupt<br />

increases in this range are noticeable between the<br />

third and second largest dwellings and the second<br />

largest and the largest dwellings. Until the second<br />

largest dwelling in Fort Hill II was expanded from its<br />

original size of 46.8 square meters to 60.7 square<br />

meters, the size difference between the largest<br />

dwelling and the next largest dwelling would have<br />

been more pronounced. As with the largest dwelling<br />

in Fort Hill I, the largest dwelling in Fort Hill II may<br />

have functioned as a men’s house/council house.<br />

Other than the plaza and the space contained within<br />

each dwelling, there were no other discretely<br />

bounded areas within Fort Hill II. While destruction<br />

by erosion makes it difficult to estimate, the space<br />

between the two palisade lines minimally encompassed<br />

1029.7 square meters, or at least 7.9 percent of<br />

the total settlement area. A larger portion of the total<br />

settlement area occurred in an arc between several<br />

dwellings and the inner palisade line. At 1619.6<br />

square meters, this space behind these 17 dwellings<br />

represented 12.4 percent of the total settlement space,<br />

Chapter 3 Modeling Village Community Organization Using Data From the Somerset County Relief Excavations 61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!