30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.1. Summary of Artifacts from the Grand Banks Site by Percentage (%) of Total Number and Weight.<br />

Area A (%) Area B (%) Area C (%) Total<br />

No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g)<br />

Pottery 55 55 31 38 14 7 29,763 30,001.0<br />

Chipped Stone 44 14 23 66 33 20 26,440 3897.9<br />

Other Stone 8 4 12 21 81 75 26 932.2<br />

Historic 100 100 19 92.8<br />

Total 50 49 27 40 23 11 56,248 34,923.9<br />

Table 5.2. Summary of Artifacts from the Grand Banks Site as Number and Weight per Square Meter.<br />

Area A Area B Area C Total<br />

No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g) No. Wt (g)<br />

Pottery 908 915 550 668 90 48 372 375<br />

Chipped Stone 648 30 354 151 194 18 331 49<br />

Other Stone - 2 - 12 - 15 - 12<br />

Historic - 2 - 1<br />

Total 1,556 947 904 831 284 83 703 437<br />

likely dates to about two hundred years ago. The<br />

Cayuga Iroquois settled on the Grand Banks flats<br />

during the late eighteenth century (Faux 1985).<br />

Lone Pine (AfGx-113)<br />

The Lone Pine site was discovered in 1989 by F.<br />

Moerschfelder, a local avocational archaeologist. It is<br />

situated at the forks of a tributary of the Grand River,<br />

about 2 km from the Grand and the same distance from<br />

the Grand Banks site. It lies on a low plateau surrounded<br />

on three sides by creek banks. The artifact<br />

bearing deposits are distributed over about 0.5 ha, and<br />

generally consist of only 15 cm of clay-loam over a base<br />

of very heavy Oneida clay. Because the overburden is<br />

so thin, artifacts have been fragmented by frost and<br />

roots. The site has never been ploughed and has otherwise<br />

been subjected to very little modern cultural disturbance<br />

and no looting. As a consequence, artifacts are<br />

clearly visible on the surface of the forest floor.<br />

The strategy of investigation at Lone Pine was<br />

directed toward discovering as much about the type of<br />

site and the nature of cultural deposits without a huge<br />

investment of time and labor. To begin, a grid was<br />

established over the entire area of the plateau and 1 m<br />

test squares were excavated at 5 m intervals (Figure<br />

5.4). This testing demonstrated that artifacts are distributed<br />

over an area of approximately 5,000 sq. m. We<br />

also discovered that settlement data, especially post<br />

molds, would be extremely difficult to discern in the<br />

heavy clay without opening up very large areas. We<br />

decided to take advantage of the thin overburden and<br />

undisturbed nature of the site by experimenting with<br />

surface collection of the forest floor. Controlled surface<br />

pickup of artifacts was conducted in 1 m wide transects<br />

(see Figure 5.4). This experiment was highly successful.<br />

It demonstrated clearly that surface artifacts were distributed<br />

variably over the whole extent of the site; several<br />

loci of more densely concentrated material were<br />

identified. Surface collection was then expanded in<br />

areas where surface-collected artifacts were densest.<br />

Subsequent excavation in four of these loci (Figure 5.4)<br />

confirmed that surface density reflected subsurface<br />

density.<br />

Chapter 5 Recent Developments in the Archaeology of the Princess Point Complex in Southern Ontario 105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!