30.04.2014 Views

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

Northeast Subsistence-Settlement Change: A.D. 700 –1300

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The features that Stothers used to characterize<br />

Princess Point include:<br />

1. a material culture assemblage notably different<br />

from antecedent Middle Woodland in both manufacture<br />

and style, including:<br />

a. “Princess Point Ware” pottery manufactured<br />

by the paddled vessel technique and decorated<br />

with cord impressions, and<br />

b. triangular projectile points similar to the<br />

Levanna type;<br />

2. presence of very limited quantities of maize, indicating<br />

incipient horticulture; and<br />

3. settlements located in riverine/lacustrine environments,<br />

interpreted to be spring-summer seasonal<br />

aggregation camps.<br />

Between 1974 and 1993 there was no large-scale<br />

research on Princess Point, although several<br />

researchers and institutions contributed both new data<br />

and interpretations. William A. Fox revised Stothers’<br />

synthesis of Princess Point, narrowing the scope of<br />

Princess Point both spatially and temporally (Fox 1984,<br />

1990). He restricted the geographic distribution to what<br />

Stothers termed the “Grand River focus” (Figure 5.2),<br />

and revised the chronology for Princess Point to A.D.<br />

<strong>700</strong>-900 (Fox 1990:182). Peter Timmins (1985) critically<br />

reexamined the radiocarbon dates recovered from<br />

Princess Point sites. This reevaluation emphasized the<br />

paucity of assays and lack of support for Stothers’<br />

three-phase chronology. In addition, Stothers himself<br />

rejected the intrusive origins of Princess Point in favor<br />

of an in situ model (Stothers and Pratt 1981). Cultural<br />

resource management operations added important<br />

new data from upland and lacustrine campsites (e.g.,<br />

Lennox and Morrison 1990; Timmins 1992).<br />

As it was interpreted as of 1993, then, the term<br />

“Princess Point” referred to an archaeological construct<br />

represented by sites concentrated along the eastern<br />

north shore of Lake Erie and the western end of Lake<br />

Ontario (Figure 5.2), and dating from ca. A.D. <strong>700</strong> to<br />

900. In fact, due to limited research, Princess Point was<br />

poorly understood from all perspectives, including the<br />

nature of Princess Point itself, its chronology, its ancestors,<br />

its contemporaries, and its descendants.<br />

N<br />

Porteous<br />

0 10 km<br />

Grand<br />

Princess Point Sites<br />

Lone<br />

Pine<br />

Young 1<br />

Grand<br />

Banks<br />

CNR Bridge<br />

Cayuga Bridge<br />

Grand<br />

Cayuga<br />

Cluster<br />

River<br />

N<br />

Cayuga<br />

Cluster<br />

River<br />

Lake Erie<br />

J. Skiba<br />

Figure 5.2. Grand River Princess Point sites.<br />

100 Smith and Crawford

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!