22.09.2015 Views

of Microprocessors

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

138 MUSICAL ApPLICATIONS OF MICROPROCESSORS<br />

The home and hobby type <strong>of</strong> microcomputer became even more<br />

differentiated from the business type. This was the era <strong>of</strong> the mass-produced,<br />

incredibly cheap, throwaway computer. The race was started by Sinclair, who<br />

introduced a machine about the size <strong>of</strong> a textbook that used a 2-80, could<br />

run BASIC, and connected to a color television set-for $100. Although it<br />

had its shortcomings (it couldn't compute and display at the same time, for<br />

example), it sold well. Commodore followed with their 6502-based VIC-20<br />

and later Commodore-64. The latter was unique in that it provided 64K<br />

bytes <strong>of</strong> memory for the same price others were charging for 16K and less.<br />

Texas Instruments repackaged their 99/4 and trimmed its price substantially.<br />

Atari also cut the price <strong>of</strong> their 400 and 800 machines to be competitive, but<br />

Apple held firm on the Apple II. During 1983, a raging price war broke out,<br />

which saw the Commodore-64 price fall as low as $180 with the other<br />

contenders proportionally less. By early 1984, only Commodore and Apple<br />

remained in the high-volume home market. Since then, Coleco and IBM<br />

have attempted to enter the market but with limited success.<br />

With the great power <strong>of</strong> recent 16-bit microprocessors, a third class <strong>of</strong><br />

microcomputer became possible: the scientific/engineering workstation.<br />

These typically used a 68000, had memory from 256K to 1M bytes or more,<br />

a very-high-resolution graphic display, and disk storage <strong>of</strong> 5M bytes and up.<br />

The operating system was typically UNIX, a very large and complex<br />

operating system originally developed for PDP-ll minicomputers. Unfortunately,<br />

along with their great power and capacity came prices that started<br />

at nearly $10,000 and went up from there. While only a tiny number<br />

(compared to business and home microcomputers) have been sold, their mere<br />

existence has influenced engineers, programmers, and product planners<br />

greatly.<br />

Apple Computer, in designing a successor for their aging Apple II,<br />

used the 68000/large-memory/graphics-display theme <strong>of</strong> the engineering<br />

workstations, scaled it down a little, and combined it with intuitive,<br />

graphics-oriented s<strong>of</strong>tware to create their Lisa and later MacIntosh computers.<br />

The former was intended for business use and is more expensive,<br />

whereas the latter seems appropriate for almost any application and costs less<br />

than $3,000. Strangely enough, neither machine has any expansion slots nor<br />

significant program development support and thus has not been attractive to<br />

hobbyists and independent add-on manufacturers at all.<br />

As you can see, the history <strong>of</strong> microcomputers has been tumultuous<br />

indeed, and the immediate future is not likely to be less so. But use in<br />

complete computers is just one application <strong>of</strong>microprocessors. Outside <strong>of</strong>the<br />

swirling computer mainstream, microprocessors are used extensively in<br />

dedicated applications to simply replace logic or increase circuit capability.<br />

Since the primary purpose <strong>of</strong> this book is to explore the musical applications<br />

<strong>of</strong>microprocessors, further discussion <strong>of</strong> specific computers will be held until<br />

Chapter 20.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!