22.09.2015 Views

of Microprocessors

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SOME REAL ApPLICATIONS 729<br />

copying, in fact, occurs whenever a patch is selected in the program select<br />

mode and also includes "expanding" the compressed format used to conserve<br />

space in the CMOS memory into a format the control program can<br />

manipulate easily.<br />

All-Digital Synthesizers<br />

The previous section described what is essentially the epitome <strong>of</strong>analog<br />

synthesizer design. Of course, mote basic waveshapes, filter modes, patching<br />

flexibility, and voice boards could be designed in to make a bigger<br />

instrument, but not really a different one. In the extremely competitive<br />

synthesizer world, as soon as one instrument design is complete and in<br />

production, work begins on a new design. Since instruments like the Chroma<br />

have taken analog sound generation technology about as far as it can go, real<br />

innovations must be in other areas. In the context <strong>of</strong> a hybrid instrument,<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the activity has been in more powerful control programs and more<br />

informative control panels. For example, many more s<strong>of</strong>tware-generated<br />

envelopes and low-frequency modulator oscillators have been included in<br />

recent designs. Numeric readouts are being replaced by alphanumeric and<br />

even limited graphics displays to allow effective communication with the<br />

more complex control programs.<br />

To come up with something truly new in a live performance synthesizer,<br />

it is becoming necessary to use digital synthesis techniques for the<br />

soun'd waveforms themselves as well as the envelope shapes. Of course, one<br />

immediate advantage <strong>of</strong> digital synthesis is its inherent accuracy. While<br />

automatic tuning is effective (provided it is performed about twice an hour<br />

and the room temperature is reasonably stable), it is not needed at all in a<br />

digital instrument. Also, factory adjustments, which must be touched up<br />

after a few years or when components are replaced, are not needed either.<br />

Finally, some synthesis algorithms, such as FM with reflected harmonic<br />

sidebands, are much more predictable when frequency uncertainties are zero.<br />

The biggest advantage <strong>of</strong> digital, however, is that the whole spectrum<br />

<strong>of</strong> synthesis techniques is available. It should not be a surprise that the<br />

synthesis technique an instrument uses affects how the user "thinks about"<br />

sound. Whereas analog synthesis is virtually synonymous with subtractive<br />

(filter) synthesis, a digital system can be based on additive (harmonic),<br />

frequency modulation, nonlinear, direct waveshaping, or even VOSIM<br />

synthesis techniques. Besides these synthesis-from-scratch methods, modification<br />

techniques such as frequency shifting, dispersion, arbitrary filtering,<br />

envelope modification, and others are potentially available. Finally, an<br />

endless variety <strong>of</strong> parameter transferral, record-playback, and analysissynthesis<br />

techniques are possible. No instrument uses all or even most <strong>of</strong><br />

these possibilities, but they do provide a rich source <strong>of</strong> ideas for instrument<br />

designers.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!