22.09.2015 Views

of Microprocessors

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

404 MUSICAL ApPLICATIONS OF MICROPROCESSORS<br />

and stopband attenuations <strong>of</strong> 50 to 90 dB are given. These should covet the<br />

range <strong>of</strong> application for audio filters from minimum cost experimental units<br />

to very sharp pr<strong>of</strong>essional application units. The element values are given in<br />

henties and farads for a cut<strong>of</strong>f frequency <strong>of</strong> 0.159 Hz and impedance level <strong>of</strong> 1<br />

ohm. To compute actual practical component values, use the formulas below:<br />

L' = 0.159RL<br />

F<br />

c' = 0.159C<br />

RF<br />

where L' and C' are the practical component values, Land C are from the<br />

table, R is the source and termination impedance, and F is the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />

frequency. Figure 12-25C shows a practical seventh order parallel resonant<br />

filter design having 0.28 dB ripple, 60 dB attenuation, a cut<strong>of</strong>ffrequency <strong>of</strong><br />

10 kHz (25 ks/s sample rate), and an impedance <strong>of</strong> 5,000 ohms. Figure<br />

12-25D shows a fifth order series resonant filter with 1.25 dB ripple, 40 dB<br />

attenuation, 5,180 Hz cut<strong>of</strong>f (12.5 ks/s sample rate), and lK impedance.<br />

Even considering the advantages <strong>of</strong> small size, inexpensive components,<br />

etc., <strong>of</strong> active implementation, actual passive implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

filter, just as shown in Fig. 12-25, does have some advantages. For one, there<br />

are only two amplifiers in the signal path to contribute noise and distortion,<br />

and these can <strong>of</strong>ten be part <strong>of</strong> surrounding circuitry and not specifically<br />

"charged" to the filter. The L-C networks can be easy to tune, which may be<br />

necessary with the higher-order filters. Finally, the component values tend to<br />

be similar in magnitude unlike the active Chebyshev filter described earlier.<br />

On the minus side, the inductors are susceptible to hum pickup from stray<br />

magnetic fields and therefore should be <strong>of</strong> torroid or pot core construction<br />

and kept away from power transformers. Also, it is conceivable that<br />

nonlinearities in the magnetic core could contribute a slight amount <strong>of</strong><br />

distortion, so relatively wide air gaps within the core should be used.<br />

lnductor size and Q are not much <strong>of</strong> a problem because the section resonant<br />

frequencies will be in the high audio range.<br />

In actually building such a filter, accurate element values are crucial;<br />

2.5% for fifth order, 1% for seventh order, and O. 5% or better for ninth<br />

order. This is normally accomplished with an impedance bridge, a bunch <strong>of</strong><br />

polystyrene capacitors, and a supply <strong>of</strong>ferrite pot cores and magnet wire. The<br />

pot cores usually have tuning slugs that simplify the task <strong>of</strong> getting exactly<br />

the right inductance, and appropriate parallel combinations <strong>of</strong> two or three<br />

capacitors can usually be determined easily. Typically, the parallel resonant<br />

form will be preferred since it has fewer inductors.<br />

An active implementation <strong>of</strong> the filter using only op-amps, resistors,<br />

and capacitors is also possible and straightforward to derive from the passive<br />

L-C circuit. Whereas the Sallen and Key circuit studied earlier is a contrived<br />

form that just happens to have the same response as a resonant R-L-C low-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!