22.09.2015 Views

of Microprocessors

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

Musical-Applications-of-Microprocessors-2ed-Chamberlin-H-1987

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MUSIC SYNTHESIS PRINCIPLES 33<br />

from zeto to the sustain is called the attack. The duration <strong>of</strong> the attack is <strong>of</strong><br />

primary importance, although its shape may also be important, particularly<br />

if the attack is long. The transition from the sustain back to zero is the decay.<br />

Again, time is the major variable. Some notes, such as a piano note, have no<br />

real sustain and start to decay immediately after the attack. They may,<br />

however, have two different rates <strong>of</strong>decay, a slow initial one, which could be<br />

considered the sustain, even though it is decaying, and a faster final one.<br />

Other envelope shapes are, <strong>of</strong> course, possible and quite useful in electronic<br />

music.<br />

As with frequency variation, an amplitude envelope may have a small<br />

wavering superimposed on the otherwise steady-state portions. Such<br />

amplitude wavering is called tremolo and, if small in amplitude, sounds much<br />

like vibrato to the untrained ear. Actually, the physical manipulation required<br />

to waver the tone <strong>of</strong> conventional instruments seldom results in pure<br />

vibrato or tremolo; usually both are present to some degree. Large-amplitude<br />

tremolo gives rise to an unmistakable throbbing sound. Generalized<br />

amplitude modulation <strong>of</strong> one waveform by another is also possible, and in<br />

many cases the effects are similar to frequency modulation. This will also be<br />

examined more closely later.<br />

Spectrum Variation<br />

Finally, dynamic changes in the spectrum <strong>of</strong> a tone are the most interesting<br />

and the most difficult to synthesize in general. The primary difference<br />

between spectrum variation and frequency or amplitude variation is<br />

that a spectrum shape is multidimensional and the other two parameters are<br />

single-dimensional. Because <strong>of</strong> this multidimensional nature, standard electronic<br />

synthesis techniques for dynamic spectrum changes generally utilize<br />

schemes that attempt to cover a wide range <strong>of</strong> timbres by varying only one or<br />

two parameters <strong>of</strong> a simplified spectrum shape.<br />

One obvious way to control and vary the spectrum is to individually<br />

control the amplitudes <strong>of</strong> the individual harmonics making up the tone. This<br />

is a completely general technique applicable to any definitely pitched tone.<br />

The problem with actually accomplishing this is tw<strong>of</strong>old. The first is the<br />

myriad <strong>of</strong>parameters to control----dozens· <strong>of</strong> harmonic amplitudes for moderately<br />

pitched tones. Involving a computer or microprocessor is the only<br />

reasonable approach to such a control task. The other problem is deciding<br />

how the harmonic amplitudes should vary to obtain the desired effect, if<br />

indeed even that is known. There are methods such as analyzing natural<br />

sounds, evaluating mathematical formulas, or choosing amplitude contours<br />

at random and subjectively evaluating the results that work well in many<br />

instances. In any case, a computer would probably be involved in generating<br />

the data also.<br />

As mentioned previously, common synthesis techniques aim at reducing<br />

the dimensionality <strong>of</strong> the spectral variation problem. Consider for a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!