29.01.2013 Views

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Service in the Naval Aeronautical Organization 101<br />

mander Turner from the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Air, Edward P.<br />

Warner, which concluded with “I hope there will be opportunity for many<br />

more such studies and practices, both in your command and elsewhere.” ‘z<br />

A copy of this letter was placed in Commander Turner’s official record.<br />

By April 1929, Commander Turner was able to report: “<strong>The</strong>re have been<br />

ten occasions when operations have been held by this squadron with units of<br />

the Army, since 1 July 1928. “ ‘3 <strong>The</strong>se included Joint Board Problems 1 and 3<br />

as set forth in Joint Board No. 350. And Admiral Bristol, at the end of the<br />

1929 fiscal year, in commenting on Fleet training during the previous 12<br />

months said:<br />

One of the most interesting features has been the development of combined<br />

Army-Navy aircraft operations.’4<br />

He summed up the matter with these words:<br />

Cooperation between the Army and Navy air forces has been excellent and<br />

great advancement made in combined operation.Gs<br />

WAR PLANS<br />

A tour of the Asiatic Station at this time also provided an excellent oppor-<br />

tunity for an analysis of war operations in the Philippines. That Commander<br />

Turner was so minded is indicated by what he wrote in April 1929:<br />

It is customary amongst Naval officers to consider it practically settled that<br />

the ORANGE [Japanese] forces in the case of an ORANGE-BLUE War,<br />

will be landed on the shores of Lingayan Gulf. <strong>The</strong> existing ASIATIC<br />

FLEET operating plan covers this contingency in considerable detail.GG<br />

Commander Turner did not controvert this surmise, which proved to be<br />

100 percent correct. But he thought, and was forthright enough to say so in a<br />

carefully reasoned three-page letter, that the possibility of a Japanese land-<br />

ing in a southern arm of Lamon Bay, called Lopez Bay, “should be again<br />

studied” by the Navy as an alternative Japanese landing objective. Lopez<br />

Bay was 125 miles by rail and road southeast of Manila. <strong>The</strong>re the water<br />

was smooth and the beaches good. Turner believed that “this matter has not<br />

‘2ASSECNAV, letter, January 26, 1929.<br />

WCOMAIRONS, A.R., 1929, pp. 6, 11.<br />

m Asiatic, A. R., 1929, p. 26.<br />

= Ibid., p. 44.<br />

WCOMAIRONS, Asiatic to CINC, Asiatic, letter, FE 14/FC–4/FF6/AV, 20 Apr. 1929.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!