29.01.2013 Views

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Planning for War, 1940-1941 175<br />

Turner wrote that Kimmel and Hart had been alerted “against an attack by<br />

Japan.” Stark softened that to “against a possible break with Japan,” a very<br />

great difference when one considers the Pearl Harbor attack.<br />

THE ATLANTIC CONFERENCE<br />

<strong>The</strong> Atlantic Conference was held in Argentia Harbor, Newfoundland,<br />

from I&l 5 August 1941. Rear Admiral Turner was one of the very small<br />

working naval staff that accompanied Admiral Stark to the conference. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were only two from War Plans, Turner and Commander Forrest Sherman,<br />

Chief of Naval Operations in 1950-51.<br />

According to Mrs. Turner:<br />

Kelly had two weeks leave granted and we were to leave on [August] first.<br />

Two nights before he came home and said that he couldn’t go. . . .<br />

He says Churchill is splendid, very simple and easy to approach and very<br />

much smaller than his pictures show.<br />

Everything is such a mess though, and no leadership. . . . I am so glad<br />

Kelly got to go and he had a fine two weeks rest.”<br />

BRITISH-AMERICAN PACIFIC PLANNING<br />

<strong>The</strong> Atlantic Conference had broad effects in both the War and Navy<br />

Departments on their planning for future contingencies. It cracked the door<br />

to Combined Planning with the British, but U.S. Naval planners proceeded<br />

very cautiously, insofar as the Pacific Ocean was concerned.<br />

A letter which Rear Admiral Turner wrote to Rear Admiral V. H. Danckwerts<br />

of the British Joint Staff Mission in Washington is informative in<br />

regard to the status of Combined Planning with the British in early October,<br />

1941. It also illustrates the security consciousness of the Chief of Naval<br />

Operations.<br />

In reply to the reference [Your secret letter No. 107/41 of Sept. 25, 1941]<br />

you are informed that we have given very careful study to the Admiralty’s<br />

proposals for a new Far East Area agreement as shown in ADB–2. . . .<br />

While neither the Army nor the Navy has reached a final decision, at the<br />

present time they are inclined to believe that, until such time as a really practicable<br />

combined plan can be evolved for the Far East Area, it will be better<br />

4’Mrs. RKT to Lucile Turner, letter, 18 Aug. 1941,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!