29.01.2013 Views

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

US Marine Corps - The Black Vault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

360 Amphibians Came To Conqner<br />

and the reviewing ot%cer on the staff of the Commander in Chief, U. S. Fleet,<br />

for the Admiral Hepburn Investigative Report gave more detail on the<br />

administrative action. He later was Judge Advocate General of the Navy and<br />

then a Vice Admiral, U. S. Navy. His review was passed on and concurred<br />

in by the Deputy Chief of Staff, Rear Admiral W. R. Purnell, later Vice<br />

Admiral, U. S. Navy, and the Chief of Staff, Vice Admiral R. S. Edwards,<br />

later Admiral, U.S. Navy.<br />

In this review, Captain Russell pointed out that:<br />

(a) Vice Admiral Ghormley, who was head man in the area, and therefore<br />

answerable for the operation, was relieved not long afterward. Regardless of<br />

the. fact that no reason for his change of duty was announced, there was a<br />

stigma attached to it, with everything indicating that he was relieved because<br />

of this defeat. . . .<br />

(b) Admiral Hepburn mentions the failure of Rear Admiral McCain to<br />

search out the area in which the Japs must have been, after Rear Admiral<br />

Turner, in effect, asked him to do so, but apparently does not feel that he<br />

should be called to account for it. . . .<br />

(c) Admiral Hepburn gives Admiral Turner pretty much a clean bill of<br />

health.<br />

(d) Vice Admiral Fletcher and Rear Admiral Noyes have been relieved of<br />

their commands. Again no reason has been assigned, but the inference is that<br />

the latter, at least, has been tried and found wanting. In other words, something<br />

has already been done, administratively.<br />

*****<br />

It does not necessarily follow that because we took a beating somebody<br />

must be the goat. . . to me it is more of an object lesson in how not to fight,<br />

than it is a failure for which someone should hang. . . .“<br />

<strong>The</strong> two-volume Naval War College analysis, in its 23 pages of “Battle<br />

Lessons,” mentions no personalities, but some of the biting “Lessons” apply<br />

directly to specific actions of specific command personalities. <strong>The</strong>re are 26<br />

Lessons. One of these was pertinent to Rear Admiral Turner personally.<br />

Nearly all of them are pertinent to every naval officer exercising command<br />

in the nuclear age, as well as in World War II, and several will be mentioned<br />

later in the chapter.<br />

THE PRIMARY CA<strong>US</strong>E—INADEQUATE AND<br />

FAULTY AIR RECONNAISSANCE<br />

Admiral Turner, when asked, in 1960, if he would name “the primary<br />

n Hepburn Report Vol. I, no ser of 13 May 1943, Memorandum for Admiral, 31 Jul. 1943,<br />

attached by Reviewing Oflicer.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!