21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I-4-5-2 Procedures — <strong>Aircraft</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> — <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

5.2.2.3.2 Minimum distance. The distance between the runway threshold <strong>and</strong> the point at which the final approach<br />

track intersects the runway centre line shall not be less than 1 400 m (see Figure I-4-5-1).<br />

5.2.2.4 Final approach track angle for helicopters. For helicopters, the final approach track shall intersect the<br />

final approach <strong>and</strong> take-<strong>of</strong>f area (FATO) axis at an angle not exceeding 30° <strong>and</strong> at a distance not less than 400 m from<br />

the FATO. When the final approach track does not intersect the extended axis <strong>of</strong> the FATO, the track shall lie within<br />

75 m <strong>of</strong> it laterally at a point 400 m from the FATO.<br />

23/11/06<br />

5.2.3 Circling approach<br />

The circling approach contains the visual phase <strong>of</strong> flight after completing an instrument approach, to bring an aircraft<br />

into position for l<strong>and</strong>ing on a runway that for operational reasons is not suitably located for straight-in approach. In<br />

addition, when the final approach track alignment or the descent gradient does not meet the criteria for a straight-in<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ing, only a circling approach shall be authorized <strong>and</strong> the track alignment should ideally be made to the centre <strong>of</strong> the<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ing area. When necessary, the final approach track may be aligned to pass over some portion <strong>of</strong> the usable l<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

surface. In exceptional cases, it may be aligned beyond the aerodrome boundary, but in no case beyond 1.9 km<br />

(1.0 NM) from the usable l<strong>and</strong>ing surface (see Figure I-4-5-2).<br />

5.3 DESCENT GRADIENT<br />

5.3.1 Gradient/angle limits<br />

5.3.1.1 Minimum/optimum descent gradient/angle. The minimum/optimum descent gradient is 5.2 per cent for the<br />

final approach segment <strong>of</strong> a non-precision approach with FAF (3° for a precision approach or approach with vertical<br />

guidance). Descent gradients steeper than the optimum should not be used unless all other means to avoid obstacles<br />

have been attempted since these steeper descent gradients may result in rates <strong>of</strong> descent which exceed the<br />

recommended limits for some aircraft on final approach.<br />

5.3.1.2 Maximum descent gradient/angle. The maximum descent gradient is:<br />

a) for non-precision procedures with FAF:<br />

6.5 per cent for a non-precision approach for Cat A <strong>and</strong> B aircraft (Cat H: 10 per cent); <strong>and</strong><br />

6.1 per cent for Cat C, D <strong>and</strong> E aircraft;<br />

b) for a non-precision approach with no FAF, see Table I-4-5-1;<br />

c) 3.5° for an approach with vertical guidance; <strong>and</strong><br />

d) for precision approaches:<br />

3.5° for a Cat I precision approach; <strong>and</strong><br />

3° for Cat <strong>II</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>II</strong>I precision approaches.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!