21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part I — Section 4, Chapter 9 I-4-9-3<br />

9.4.5 <strong>Visual</strong> manoeuvring<br />

9.4.5.1 A sector in the circling area where a prominent obstacle exists may be ignored for OCA/H calculations if<br />

it meets the criteria listed in Chapter 7, 7.4.1, “Area which can be ignored”.<br />

9.4.5.2 When this option is exercised, the published procedure must prohibit the pilot from circling within the<br />

total sector where the obstacle exists.<br />

9.4.6 <strong>Visual</strong> manoeuvring with prescribed track<br />

9.4.6.1 The length <strong>and</strong> magnetic orientation <strong>of</strong> the diverging segment must be published.<br />

9.4.6.2 The length <strong>and</strong> magnetic orientation <strong>of</strong> the ‘‘downwind’’ leg must be published.<br />

9.4.6.3 Radius <strong>of</strong> turn. If necessary (because constraining obstacles have to be avoided) the indicated airspeed<br />

may be reduced to not less than the maximum indicated airspeed for the final segment (Tables I-4-1-1 <strong>and</strong> I-4-1-2 <strong>of</strong><br />

Chapter 1) for the aircraft category. In such a case, the maximum indicated speed must be published on the chart.<br />

9.5 PROCEDURE NAMING FOR ARRIVAL AND APPROACH CHARTS<br />

9.5.1 <strong>Instrument</strong> Flight Procedure Naming Convention<br />

This paragraph describes the general aspects <strong>of</strong> instrument procedure naming. Specific aspects are covered in the<br />

appropriate chapters. A st<strong>and</strong>ardized naming convention is required to avoid ambiguity between charts, electronic<br />

cockpit displays <strong>and</strong> ATC clearances. This convention affects the following charting aspects:<br />

a) procedure identification;<br />

b) additional equipment requirements; <strong>and</strong><br />

c) minimum boxes.<br />

9.5.2 Procedure identification<br />

9.5.2.1 General. The procedure identification shall only contain the name describing the type <strong>of</strong> radio navigation<br />

aid providing the final approach lateral guidance. Precision approach systems such as ILS or MLS shall be identified by<br />

the system name (ILS, MLS, etc.). If two radio navigation aids are used for final approach lateral guidance, the title<br />

shall only include the last radio navigation aid used. For example:<br />

if an NDB is used as the final approach fix <strong>and</strong> a VOR is used as the last navaid on the final approach to runway 06,<br />

the procedure shall be identified as VOR Rwy 06. If a VOR is used for the initial approach followed by a final<br />

approach to Rwy 24 using an NDB, the procedure shall be identified as NDB Rwy 24.<br />

9.5.2.2 Additional navaids. If additional navigation aids are required (such as fix formations or transition routes)<br />

for the approach procedure, they shall be specified on the plan view <strong>of</strong> the chart, but not in the title.<br />

23/11/06

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!