21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>II</strong>-2-1-2 Procedures — <strong>Aircraft</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> — <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

1.3.3.4 In the final approach <strong>and</strong> missed approach areas, those areas bounded by the lines joining points D, D”, E”<br />

<strong>and</strong> E are treated as secondary areas.<br />

1.3.3.5 The final approach/initial missed approach areas terminate at the end <strong>of</strong> the transitional tolerance area as<br />

determined in the general criteria (see Part I, Section 4, Chapter 6; see also Part I, Section 2, Chapter 2, 2.6.4.2, “Use <strong>of</strong><br />

75 MHz marker beacon” <strong>and</strong> Part I, Section 4, Chapter 6, 6.1.6.2, “Determining SOC with an MAPt defined by a<br />

navigation facility or fix” for use <strong>of</strong> markers as missed approach points).<br />

1.3.3.6 For turning missed approaches the general criteria in Part I, Section 4, Chapter 6, 6.4, “Turning missed<br />

approach” may be applied from the end <strong>of</strong> the transitional tolerance area.<br />

1.3.3.7 The straight missed approach area is defined by the width <strong>of</strong> the 300 m (984 ft) Y surface contour to point<br />

E” (see Figure <strong>II</strong>-2-1-1) after which the splay increases to 15 degrees.<br />

23/11/06<br />

1.3.4 Obstacle clearance<br />

The MOC is 75 m (246 ft) in the primary area, reducing to zero at the outer edges <strong>of</strong> the secondary areas. The general<br />

criteria apply except that obstacles in the secondary areas underlying the OAS Y surfaces are only considered if they<br />

penetrate those surfaces, in which case the required obstacle clearance is determined as in Part I, Section 2, Chapter 1,<br />

Figure I-2-1-3, <strong>and</strong> Figure <strong>II</strong>-2-1-2. See item b) in Part I, Section 4, Chapter 5, 5.4.5, “MOC <strong>and</strong> OCA/H adjustments”<br />

for increased MOC due to excessive length <strong>of</strong> final segment <strong>and</strong> Part I, Section 2, Chapter 1, 1.5, “Increased<br />

altitudes/heights for mountainous areas” regarding increased altitudes/heights for mountainous areas.<br />

1.3.5 Descent gradient for an ILS procedure with glide path inoperative<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> procedure is associated with glide path failure. Therefore it is recommended, when possible, to specify the<br />

same descent gradient for both the ILS procedure with glide path inoperative <strong>and</strong> the corresponding ILS procedure (see<br />

Annex 4, 11.10.8.5).<br />

1.3.6 Promulgation<br />

1.3.6.1 The general criteria in Part I, Section 2, Chapter 1, 1.10, “Promulgation” apply. The instrument approach<br />

chart for a localizer-only approach procedure shall be identified by the title LLZ RWY XX. If the localizer-only<br />

approach is published on the same chart as the ILS approach, the chart shall be entitled ILS or LLZ RWY XX. If a<br />

DME is required it shall be indicated in a note on the chart.<br />

1.3.6.2 For promulgation <strong>of</strong> procedure altitudes/heights <strong>and</strong> the descent gradient/angle for an ILS procedure with<br />

glide path inoperative, see Part I, Section 4, Chapter 5, 5.5, “Promulgation”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!