21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

I-2-2-4 Procedures — <strong>Aircraft</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> — <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

or d=0.033h(dinNM,hinthous<strong>and</strong>s<strong>of</strong>feet).<br />

For a cone angle <strong>of</strong> 50 degrees, the accuracy <strong>of</strong> entry is ± 5°. From the points <strong>of</strong> entry, tracking through the cone is<br />

assumed to be achieved within an accuracy <strong>of</strong> ± 5°. Passage over the VOR is assumed to be indicated within the limits<br />

<strong>of</strong> the cone <strong>of</strong> ambiguity. See Figure I-2-2-3. If the facility defines the MAPt or the turning point in the missed<br />

approach, fixed values are used (see Section 4, Chapter 6, 6.1.6.1.2 <strong>and</strong> 6.4.6.2).<br />

23/11/06<br />

2.5.2 NDB<br />

A cone effect area based upon an inverted cone <strong>of</strong> ambiguity extending at an angle <strong>of</strong> 40 degrees either side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

facility should be used in calculating the areas. Entry into the cone is assumed to be achieved within an accuracy <strong>of</strong><br />

± 15° from the prescribed inbound track. From the points <strong>of</strong> entry, tracking through the cone is assumed to be achieved<br />

within an accuracy <strong>of</strong> ± 5°. See Figure I-2-2-4. If the facility defines the MAPt or the turning point in the missed<br />

approach, fixed values are used (see Section 4, Chapter 6, 6.1.6.2.1 <strong>and</strong> 6.4.6.2).<br />

2.6 OPERATIONAL APPLICATION OF FIXES FOR FLIGHT PROCEDURE PLANNING<br />

2.6.1 Minimum usable ground distance to a VOR/DME fix<br />

The minimum usable ground distance to a VOR/DME fix can be determined from the following equations.<br />

dm =hl tan 55°<br />

where: hl = height above the facility in thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> metres; <strong>and</strong><br />

dm = minimum usable DME ground distance in kilometers<br />

or dm = 0.164 hl tan 55°<br />

where: hl = height above the facility in thous<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> feet; <strong>and</strong><br />

dm = minimum usable DME ground distance in nautical miles.<br />

2.6.2 Initial/Intermediate approach fix<br />

To be satisfactory as an intermediate or initial approach fix, the fix tolerance (along track tolerance (ATT) for RNAV)<br />

must not be larger than ± 3.7 km (± 2.0 NM) with the following exception. When the FAF is a VOR, NDB or<br />

VOR/DME fix, the fix tolerance may be increased to not greater than ± 25 per cent <strong>of</strong> the corresponding segment’s<br />

length (intermediate or initial, as appropriate).<br />

Example: If the intermediate or initial segment is 10 NM in length, then the fix tolerance may be 2.5 NM.<br />

Measurements are made from the nominal fix positions along the nominal flight track. See Figure I-2-2-5.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!