21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part <strong>II</strong> — Section 1, Chapter 1 <strong>II</strong>-1-1-13<br />

Correction for glide path angle:<br />

5 3.5 – 3.2<br />

22 × × = 3.30 m<br />

100 0.1<br />

Total correction 5.72 m rounded up to 6 m.<br />

Corrected radio altimeter margin 22 + 6 = 28 m.<br />

Corrected pressure altimeter margin 46 + 6 = 52 m.<br />

1.4.8.8.3.2 Exceptions <strong>and</strong> adjustments to values in Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-2. Values in Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-2 are calculated to<br />

account for aircraft using normal manual overshoot procedures from OCA/H on the nominal approach path. The values<br />

in Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-2 do not apply to Cat <strong>II</strong>I operations. The values do not consider the lateral displacement <strong>of</strong> an obstacle<br />

nor the probability <strong>of</strong> an aircraft being so displaced. If consideration <strong>of</strong> these joint probabilities is required, then the<br />

CRM discussed in 1.4.9 shall be used. Values in Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-2 may be adjusted for specific aircraft types where<br />

adequate flight <strong>and</strong> theoretical evidence is available, i.e. the height loss value corresponding to a probability <strong>of</strong> 1 × 10 -5<br />

(based on a missed approach rate 10 -2 ).<br />

1.4.8.8.3.3 Radio altimeter verification. If the radio altimeter OCA/H is promulgated, operational checks shall<br />

have confirmed the repeatability <strong>of</strong> radio altimeter information.<br />

1.4.8.8.3.4 Height loss (HL)/altimeter margins for a specific speed at threshold. If a height loss/altimeter margin<br />

is required for a specific Vat, the following formulae apply (see also Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-4):<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> radio altimeter:<br />

Margin = (0.096 Vat – 3.2) metres where Vat in km/h<br />

Margin = (0.177 Vat – 3.2) metres where Vat in kt<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> pressure altimeter:<br />

Margin = (0.068 Vat + 28.3) metres where Vat in km/h<br />

Margin = (0.125 Vat + 28.3) metres where Vat in kt<br />

where Vat is the speed at threshold based on 1.3 times stall speed in the l<strong>and</strong>ing configuration at maximum certificated<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ing mass.<br />

Note.— The equations assume the aerodynamic <strong>and</strong> dynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the aircraft are directly related to<br />

the speed category. Thus, the calculated height loss/altimeter margins may not realistically represent small aircraft<br />

with VAT at maximum l<strong>and</strong>ing mass exceeding 165 kt.<br />

1.4.8.8.3.5 Height loss (HL)/altimeter margins for a specific speed at threshold (Helicopters). For helicopter<br />

operations the concept <strong>of</strong> Vat is not applicable. Height loss margins are listed in Table <strong>II</strong>-1-1-2.<br />

1.4.8.9 Effect <strong>of</strong> obstacle density on OCA/H. To assess the acceptability <strong>of</strong> obstacle density below the OAS, the<br />

CRM described in 1.4.9 may be used. This can provide assistance by comparing aerodrome environments <strong>and</strong> by<br />

assessing risk levels associated with given OCA/H values. It is emphasized that it is not a substitute for operational<br />

judgement.<br />

23/11/06

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!