21.03.2013 Views

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

Aircraft Operations. Volume II - Construction of Visual and Instrument ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>II</strong>-1-3-14 Procedures — <strong>Aircraft</strong> <strong>Operations</strong> — <strong>Volume</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

3.4.8.8.3.3 Radio altimeter verification. If the radio altimeter OCA/H is promulgated, operational checks shall<br />

have confirmed the repeatability <strong>of</strong> radio altimeter information.<br />

3.4.8.8.3.4 Height loss (HL)/altimeter margins for a specific speed at threshold. If a height loss/altimeter margin<br />

is required for a specific Vat, the following formulae apply (see also Table <strong>II</strong>-1-3-4):<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> radio altimeter:<br />

Margin = (0.096 Vat – 3.2) metres where Vat in km/h<br />

Margin = (0.177 Vat – 3.2) metres where Vat in kt<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> pressure altimeter:<br />

Margin = (0.068 Vat + 28.3) metres where Vat in km/h<br />

Margin = (0.125 Vat + 28.3) metres where Vat in kt<br />

where Vat is the speed at threshold based on 1.3 times stall speed in the l<strong>and</strong>ing configuration at maximum certificated<br />

l<strong>and</strong>ing mass.<br />

Note.— The equations assume the aerodynamic <strong>and</strong> dynamic characteristics <strong>of</strong> the aircraft are directly related to<br />

the speed category. Thus, the calculated height loss/altimeter margins may not realistically represent small aircraft<br />

with Vat at maximum l<strong>and</strong>ing mass exceeding 165 kt.<br />

3.4.8.9 Effect <strong>of</strong> obstacle density on OCA/H. To assess the acceptability <strong>of</strong> obstacle density below the OAS, the<br />

ILS CRM described in 3.4.9 may be used. This can provide assistance by comparing aerodrome environments <strong>and</strong> by<br />

assessing risk levels associated with given OCA/H values. It is emphasized that it is not a substitute for operational<br />

judgement.<br />

23/11/06<br />

3.4.9 Obstacle clearance in the precision segment — application <strong>of</strong> the ILS collision risk model<br />

(CRM) to MLS operations<br />

3.4.9.1 General. The ILS CRM is a computer program that establishes the numerical risk which can be compared<br />

to the target level <strong>of</strong> safety for aircraft operating to a specified OCA/H height. A description <strong>of</strong> the programme <strong>and</strong><br />

instructions on its use, including the precise format <strong>of</strong> both the data required as input <strong>and</strong> the output results, are given in<br />

the Manual on the Use <strong>of</strong> the Collision Risk Model (CRM) for ILS <strong>Operations</strong> (Doc 9274).<br />

3.4.9.2 Input. When applied to MLS operations, the ILS CRM requires the following data as input:<br />

a) aerodrome details: name, runway threshold position <strong>and</strong> runway orientation in map grid coordinates (optional),<br />

threshold elevation above MSL;<br />

b) MLS parameters: category (the appropriate ILS category as defined in 3.4.8.8.1), glide path (elevation angle),<br />

azimuth-threshold distance, azimuth nominal course width, height <strong>of</strong> MLS reference datum above threshold;<br />

c) missed approach parameters: decision height (obstacle clearance height) <strong>and</strong> missed approach turn point;<br />

d) aircraft parameters: type, wheel height (antenna to bottom <strong>of</strong> wheel), <strong>and</strong> wing semi-span, aircraft category (A,<br />

B, C, D or DL) missed approach climb gradient; <strong>and</strong><br />

Note.— The CRM does not consider Category E aircraft.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!