Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy HOU/3 Housing Density Rep No Name People Type 1556 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] 1 Support Summary Supports in principle that higher density development should be encouraged in sustainable locations, in line with PPW 2002, para. 2.5.3, considers these to be locations near existing or planned public transport nodes or corridors, where there is good access to local services and facilities. To ensure high densities do not compromise the quality of the environment of new sites, sites will need to be carefully designed. We welcome the recognition in Paragraph 4.67, that lower density levels may be needed in certain locations. CCW considers that density levels should also take into account an area's character and environmental capacity. 5158 Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) [2073] 1 Support Summary Our client support the content of the policy. Change Sought: The policy should recognise that previously developed sites should be prioritised over Greenfield sites and that densities on previously developed sites could be increased to protect greenfield sites against development and to protect the natural and built environment of the area in line with one of the priorities of the LDP. the Dolgarrog site has the opportunity of providing both high and low density housing to reflect the different characteristics of the site and surroundings. 516 Leonard Jinks Architecural Consultants Ltd (Leonard Jinks) [789] 1 Object Summary Page 83 HOU/3 Housing Density Change Sought: The housing density of 30 per hectare will not be possible in some locations to take account of public open space and tree protection. There should therefore be more flexibility built into the policy to allow for less and this is the change requested. Again fails test CE2. There should therefore be more flexibility built into the policy to allow for less and this is the change requested. 110
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy HOU/4 Housing Mix Rep No Name 5372 Goodwin Planning Services Ltd (Mr Stephen Goodwin) [1162] Summary The policy as currently worded fails to meet the soundness test CE2 in that it is not founded on a robust and credible evidence base. People Type The Council have acknowledged that the local housing market assessment (phase 2) is not yet available. However, they seek to be extremely prescriptive in the mix of house types on all developments of 5 or more dwellings. Change Sought: Replace policy wording with:- "The Council will seek to secure the provision on appropriate mix of market housing and affordable housing for local need reflecting the requirements of the latest local housing market assessment and the needs of individual settlements. 1263 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 1 Object Summary Policy HOU/4 does not have sufficient evidence base to support it and is unlikely to deliver its targets anyway. Simply because there may be a mis-match between the number and types of households is not a case for building dwellings for smaller households. Change Sought: To make the Plan sound the policies should be deleted or replaced with a sound evidence based policy to accommodate any future increase in smaller households. 1748 Watkin Jones Homes (Mr Goronwy Owen) [879] Summary We propose that the mix of housing types on the site be left to market forces and that this should not be a stipulated LDP policy. Change Sought: We propose that the mix of housing types on the site be left to market forces and that this should not be a stipulated LDP policy. 517 Leonard Jinks Architecural Consultants Ltd (Leonard Jinks) [789] 1 Object Summary Page 84 Policy HOU/4 Housing Mix Change Sought: This policy is too prescriptive with regard to the mix of house sizes and should be more flexible otherwise developers will be inhibited from developing sites. Whilst the policy does allow some flexibility it is not clear how this will be implemented in practice. I would suggest that a range of percentages is used so that it will be easier to comply e.g. 60-70% for 1 and 2 bedroom houses. 1520 Sian Hooson (Ms Sian Hooson) [828] 1 Object Summary Affordable housing is more likely to be occupied by people who do not have a car of their own. Therefore safeguards are needed to ensure that affordable houses are situated in a convenient location within a large new housing development site. Easy access to public transport links and local services is particularly important for older and disabled people and for younger people with children, whose lives can become very restricted and isolated if marginalised on the edge of housing developments. Change Sought: To ensure that there is specific guidance for developers on the positioning of affordable housing within a larger housing complex so that they are placed as near to transport hubs and local services as possible. 1806 Redrow (Mr Robin Buckley) [1996] Summary Redrow object to Policy HOU/4 - Housing Mix for the following reasons:- 1.The Policy is too prescriptive and would not allow developers to respond to market demand; which they are uniquely qualified to assess. 2.Developers will not build houses which they cannot sell, so the Policy risks diverting development outside the County. Change Sought: 3.The Policy confuses need with demand, in that most single person households aspire to housing with two or more bedrooms; not least because it offers more flexibility for changing lifestyles/circumstances. The Policy should be reworded to state that, ''the Council will seek to ensure an appropriate mix of house types in all new developments, having regard to the character of the surrounding area. Provision of affordable housing should take into account the findings of the Council's Local Housing Market Assessment''. 1459 Denbighshire County Council - Planning Policy (Martha Savage) [1843] 1 Object Summary It is considered that policy HOU/4 is an overly prescriptive approach that could limit the flexibility of the plan, although Conwy propose to produce an SPG to provide clarity on this policy. Change Sought: Await publication of SPG to provide clarity on this policy. 1 1 1 Object Object Object 111
Page 1 and 2:
CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4:
Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6:
LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24:
THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 109: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298:
SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300:
SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?