Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES 4.9.4 Safeguarding Hard Rock Resources, Policy MWS/3 SAFEGUARDING HARD ROCK RESOURCES Rep No Name 13500 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. (Mr Shaun Denny) [636] Summary The Company both notes and supports the identification of Raynes Quarry as a safeguarded hard rock reserve and associated buffer zone. People Type 14537 Chattelle Developments Ltd (Mr Willie Donnelly) [4484] 1 Object Summary Including Ty Mawr site in a Safeguarded Hard Rock Reserve therefore precludes its allocation for the proposed live/work development as such development is seen as directly or indirectly harming the long-term viability of working these reserves. It also effectively precludes any other similar land use from the area. The designation in this area is a narrow tonge of land between 150/200 metres wide. It is difficult to see any circumstances arising when planning permission would be granted for quarrying and mineral extraction. Utilising the hard rock reserves is completely impractical and will inevitably lead to planning blight in the area. Change Sought: The Safeguarded Hard Rock Reserve area designation in the Ty Mawr area should be omitted from the Proposals Map on the grounds that it is a completely pointless designation bearing in mind its restricted size and the type and nature of the surrounding development. 19183 Mineral Products Association ltd (Mr Malcolm Ratcliff) [4536] 1 Object Summary In view of our objections to MWS/1 we wish to object to this policy on the grounds that it does not protect all potential mineral resources as required by national policy. As a minimum it should safeguard all igneous rock deposits given their long term strategic importance as a source of aggregate. In addition, all potential limestone resources in the coastal zone should be safeguarded including those to the west. Change Sought: We suggest that Section 1 of the policy be amended as follows, "All potential igneous rock and limestone resources wil be safeguarded by inclusion within the Safeguarded Hard Rock designation as shown on the Proposals Map." 1 Support 436
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES 4.9.5 Quarry Buffer Zone, Policy MWS/4 QUARRY BUFFER ZONES Rep No Name 19184 Mineral Products Association ltd (Mr Malcolm Ratcliff) [4536] Summary We support this policy. 13501 CEMEX UK Operations Ltd. (Mr Shaun Denny) [636] Summary The Company both notes and supports the identification of Raynes Quarry as a safeguarded hard rock reserve and associated buffer zone. People Type 14538 Chattelle Developments Ltd (Mr Willie Donnelly) [4484] 1 Object Summary Paragraph 40 of MPPW would allow for the development of the site as it states that "within the buffer zone, there should be no new sensitive development, except where the site of the new developmenet in relation to the mineral operation would be located within or on the far side of an existing built up area which already encroaches into the buffer zone." The Buffer Zone designation on the Ty Mawr site area on the Proposals Map is misleading and incorrect. It clearly results form a misinterpretation of the definition of buffer zones set out in MPPW and MTAN1. Change Sought: The Raynes Quarry buffer zone should be correctly drawn in relation to the Ty Mawr site so as to exclude the site from the prohibitive designation. 13862 Town and Country Planning Services (Conwy) (Mr K Evans) [2030] 1 Object Summary The Penmaenmawr buffer zone around the hard rock quarry is arbitrarily drawn and is not serving any planning purpose in some locations other than to blight property which has reasonably beneficial use. The buffers are unlikely to have workable resources because they have gardens or allotmenets within them. Paragraph 4.9.5.2 accepts these issues. Policy MWS/4 and the proposals map for Penmaenmawr is in conflict with the statements in Policyi MWS/1 and MWS/3(a) as areas have been excluded on the Proposals Map yet other areas are included. The policy is arbitrary and unacceptable in its impact for adjacent residential properties. Change Sought: The policy and proposals map must be reviewed and reduced to avoid planning blight. 1 1 Support Support 437
Page 1 and 2:
CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4:
Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6:
LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10:
INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12:
INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16:
INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22:
VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24:
THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298:
SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300:
SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386: SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 435: SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 441 and 442: SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?