Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAMEWORK
5.5.3
Rep No Name
People Type
22386 Mrs Searl [5170]
1 Support
Summary It is noted that the Council have amended their previous proposals such that the residential and employment development of the site at Esgyryn can be
brought forward together, with development able to commence in 2012, clearly this is supported.
Change Sought:
However, significant concern is raised regarding the allocation of a number of sites which have significant constraints to development and question marks
over their deliverability during the Plan period.
Sites at risk from flooding or increasing flood risk elsewhere should be removed from the Plan. The swelling units on such sites should then be re-directed to
other sites where constraints to development are not prohibitive.
22342 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176]
1 Object
Summary Table 11 (implementation and monitoring section) does not identify which of the contingency sites the local authority considers to be more suitable to be
brought forward earlier than indicated should this be necessary, if for example, commitments or windfalls fail to materialise. An opportunity has been missed
to demonstrate more clearly the degree to which the plan is flexible and would benefit from being rectified.
The authority suggests that it would wish to develop the sties on previously developed land in the first instance, but it is not clear whether this applies to the
listed sites in Table 11.
Change Sought: An opportunity has been missed to demonstrate more clearly the degree to which the plan is flexible and would benefit from being rectified.
Although the table and background paper 21 includes information on constraints, it is not clear how much of a constraint some of these are and how much
they effect the deliverability of the sites in comparison to those not included in the LDP.
443