Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy DP/1 Sustainable Development Principles Rep No Name People Type 44 Ryan Bowen (Mr Ryan Bowen) [110] 1 Support Summary Planning Policy Wales states that the planning system has an important part to play in ensuring the infrastructure on which communities and businesses depend is adequate to accommodate proposed development. The importance of utility services for the promotion of new development and their sustainability is referenced in Chapter 12. We are pleased that you have included in this Policy, sub points 1(c), 1(g), 2(c) and 2(f). 136 Mr J Williams [237] 1 Summary I am satisfied with the LDP as it stands. I write in support of the Green Wedges Policies, and of Policy DP/1 to protect prime agricultural land from development. Change Sought: <strong>Non</strong>e 435 Miss Ida W Jones [727] Summary To protect the wonderful diversity of wildlife & flora in Conwy. 124 Llandudno Safe Cycling Group (Dr Neil McKenzie) [207] 1 Support Summary paras 2a & 2b 2.Development proposals should also where appropriate a.provide safe and convenient access by public transport, bicycle and on foot minimising the need to travel by car in line with Policy DP/2 'Overarching Strategic Approach' and STR/1 'Sustainable Transport ; b.include measures to manage traffic and minimise congestion arising in line with STR/1 'Sustainable Transport ; c.make provision for infrastructure and other public services made necessary by the development, in line with Policies DP/4 'Development 1541 National Public Health Service for Wales (Dr Rob Atenstaedt) [1938] 1 Support Summary The written statement (text) 'Conwy Deposit Local Development Plan 2007-2022', makes reference to the contribution of planning to providing a healthy environment, and provides an opportunity to set a strategic direction to improve the lives of the residents of Conwy to reverse the trend towards obesogenic environments and instead encourage sustainable communities, with multiple benefits for climate change, health and wellbeing, and health inequalities. See attachment for full response. Change Sought: The LPHT would be willing to explore opportunities to support the LDP process, particularly to develop a common understanding of health amongst planners, and to explore the stages of the planning cycle which have the potential to maximise health benefit. There are numerous 'healthy urban toolkits' available to support this process and I understand that the Wales Centre for Health are working jointly with the Welsh Assembly Government to develop a toolkit for Wales I would suggest that an additional sustainable development principle to be adopted is that any decision on development should take account of it's impact on the health of the population (both positive and negative). See attachment for full response. 5154 Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) [2073] 1 Support Summary We support the general emphasis of the policy, especially making efficient and effective use of land, particularly previously developed land and sustainable building techniques. 1542 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] Summary CCW fully supports these over-arching principles and that they should apply to all the other policies in the LDP. It is particularly necessary for DP1/1/e to be applied to all policies in order to comply with legal duties to protect designated sites and protected species. 671 Mr Martyn Bottomley [844] Summary Preferred residential development of brown field sites such as the test centre at Rhos on Sea rather than agricultural land identified on Map 2. Change Sought: Preferred residential development of brown field sites such as the test centre at Rhos on Sea rather than agricultural land identified on Map 2. 809 Campaign for the Protection of Rural Wales (Mr Richard Waters) [985] 1 Object Summary By stating in DP/1 (1) that this section of the policy covers all developments would seem to be excessive. For some developments such as domestic extensions to be subject to the rigours of several of the matters covered in the first part of that policy many of these criteria are not relevant - such as enhancing the sequential approach, the quality of biodiversity. It would be much more appropriate to say "where appropriate" as in DP/1 (2). Change Sought: Policy DP/1 should be reworded accordingly to reflect the differing compliance requirements for varying magnitudes and types of development. 1173 Gordon Kenyon (Kenyon & Company) (Mr Gordon Kenyon) [1188] 1 Object Summary Supports continued allocation of Gwellyn Avenue. However, Until the results of the remodelling exercise are published and considered, and proposals have been developed for adequately dealing with any flood risk identified, then it is considered that proposals for development in Towyn and Kinmel Bay are premature as they are not founded upon a robust and credible evidence base. Change Sought: Await results of the Conwy Tidal Flood Risk Assessment and adress any issues. 1251 Anwyl Construction Ltd (Mr Mike Pender) [1514] 1 Object Summary Objections to the LDP on policy grounds. Many policies are unviable, unrealistic and inflexible, many are aspirational and perhaps should not be included in a spatial planning document, and it is difficult to separate out with parts are policy and which are justification/explanation. See attachment. Change Sought: The Plan is unsound as it does not provide realistic policies which can be applied and implemented. 1500 Community Development Services - Conwy County Borough Council (Mr Robert Dix) [1878] Summary We would also ask if Policy DP/1 2c should include reference to community facilities. Change Sought: We would also ask if Policy DP/1 2c should include reference to community facilities. 7245 Welsh Assembly Government (Mr Mark Newey) [2176] Summary Repetition of national planning policy without translating it to local level e.g. DP/1 and DP/3 etc Change Sought: Make policy relevant at a local level. 1510 Community Development Services - Conwy County Borough Council (Mr Robert Dix) [1878] 1 Object Summary A weakness of the Plan seems to be the lack of cross reference to cultural issues through the various sections. Language and the areas culture should be protected throughout and entwined in consideration of impact upon the community. This is not at all clear. Change Sought: See summary. 1 1 1 1 1 Support Support Support Object Object Object 42
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT CONTROL POLICIES Policy DP/2 Overarching Strategic Approach Rep No Name 137 Mr J Williams [237] 1 Summary I am satisfied with the LDP as it stands. I write in support of the Green Wedges Policies, and of Policy DP/1 to protect prime agricultural land from development. Change Sought: <strong>Non</strong>e People Type 648 Rossisle Ltd [833] 1 Support Summary The policy is broadly supported although care is needed not to place too much reliance on large sites in main villages. Allocating a number of smaller sites within enlarged settlement boundaries may be a more sustainable way of managing additional growth and ensuring planned and phased delivery of housing. 126 Llandudno Safe Cycling Group (Dr Neil McKenzie) [207] 1 Support Summary Re: urban area development, "sustainable" communities in Llandudno should mean primarily high-quality homes for retirees, as this is the clear priority indicated by demographic data - this is a highly desirable retirement town and the influx of affluent retirees provides a sustainable economic input and continuing self-supporting community. 194 RWE Npower Renewables (Mr Martin Cole) [474] 1 Support Summary POLICY DP/2 - OVERARCHING STRATEGIC APPROACH This Policy provides the overarching strategic approach, however there is no mention of renewable energy at all. As TAN8 - Renewable Energy is strategic in nature, NRL considers that renewable energy should be added to this policy. 1543 Countryside Council for Wales (Mr Richard Ninnes) [1948] Summary CCW supports the overall strategic approach. Subject to views on actual sites, CCW supports the approach that has been taken to identifying where development will be located (4.15). 5155 Ainscough Strategic Land. (Mr Nigel McGurk) [2073] 1 Support Summary Ainscough Johnson supoprt the general emphasis of the policy, however, we have some concern with the supporting text on page 54 which refers to the "development constraints within Dolgarrog" and "development will be limited". This implies that the council and the LDP will not encourage larger scale development proposals within Dolgarrog which is at odds with Proposals Map 6 and Policy EMP/4 of the LDP which allocate the site as a mixed use site. Change Sought: The suporting text to Policy DP/2 be amended to recognise the redevelopment potential of the former aluminium factory and its ability to deliver land for employment, housing, tourism and leisure uses over the plan period and beyond. This would be consistent with Policy EMP/4 of the LDP 1758 Mr Andrew Richards [1998] Summary Support of the settlement boundary proposed for Llysfaen and the fact that there are no further allocations proposed in the village. 1471 Conwy Children and Young People's Partnership (Ms Alwen Sian Williams) [1867] Summary Don't wreck the countryside with too many houses/flats. 7088 Mr Stephen Simpson [1544] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 3388 Mrs Alma Covatt [1550] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 5207 Mr Ian John Merton Coney [1531] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 5214 Mr Alburt D Bradshaw [1532] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 3380 Mrs Ormesher [1549] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 2276 Mr Alan Brian Landucci [1236] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 5221 Mr Michael Killoran [1533] 1 Object Summary Objection to the housing growth and spatial distribution of development in Abergele. There is no significant justification or evidence base for the housing figure of 6,300 dwellings. Abergele has seen and absorbed significant growth over previous plans, this has resulted in large scale housing growth to the South of the town, off Sea Road and in Pensarn. Change Sought: Housing growth option one would be more appropriate, delivering 3750 dwellings over the plan period. With greater emphasis on bringing vacant and empty homes back into use, reducing the demand on Greenfield land. 1 1 1 Support Support Support Support 43
Page 1 and 2: CYNLLUN DATBLYGU LLEOL CONWY I’W
Page 3 and 4: Policy CTH/3 Buildings and Structur
Page 5 and 6: LDP - Deposit Plan INTRODUCTION 1.2
Page 7 and 8: INTRODUCTION 1.5 Rep No Name 1434 L
Page 9 and 10: INTRODUCTION 1.19 Tests of Soundnes
Page 11 and 12: INTRODUCTION 1.24 Policy Framework
Page 13 and 14: INTRODUCTION 1.26 Plan Area context
Page 15 and 16: INTRODUCTION 1.32 Rep No Name Peopl
Page 17 and 18: VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.1 A Vision
Page 19 and 20: VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.6 Rep No Na
Page 21 and 22: VISION AND OBJECTIVES 2.8 Rep No Na
Page 23 and 24: THE SPATIAL STRATEGY AND KEY DIAGRA
Page 41: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 45 and 46: SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 93 and 94:
SPATIAL POLICIES, KEY DIAGRAMS AND
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
Page 243 and 244:
Page 245 and 246:
Page 247 and 248:
Page 249 and 250:
Page 251 and 252:
Page 253 and 254:
Page 255 and 256:
Page 257 and 258:
Page 259 and 260:
Page 261 and 262:
Page 263 and 264:
Page 265 and 266:
Page 267 and 268:
Page 269 and 270:
Page 271 and 272:
Page 273 and 274:
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING FRAME
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.2 The
Page 293 and 294:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.3.3 Re
Page 295 and 296:
SECTION ONE - INTRODUCTION 1.8 Coll
Page 297 and 298:
SECTION TWO - VISION AND OBJECTIVES
Page 299 and 300:
SECTION THREE - THE SPATIAL STRATEG
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
SECTION FOUR - SPATIAL POLICIES, KE
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
Page 349 and 350:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
Page 359 and 360:
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Page 371 and 372:
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
Page 381 and 382:
Page 383 and 384:
Page 385 and 386:
Page 387 and 388:
Page 389 and 390:
Page 391 and 392:
Page 393 and 394:
Page 395 and 396:
Page 397 and 398:
Page 399 and 400:
Page 401 and 402:
Page 403 and 404:
Page 405 and 406:
Page 407 and 408:
Page 409 and 410:
Page 411 and 412:
Page 413 and 414:
Page 415 and 416:
Page 417 and 418:
Page 419 and 420:
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
Page 425 and 426:
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
Page 431 and 432:
Page 433 and 434:
Page 435 and 436:
Page 437 and 438:
Page 439 and 440:
Page 441 and 442:
SECTION FIVE - IMPLEMENTATION AND M
Page 443 and 444:
Page 445 and 446:
show all

Non Site Allocation Representations Report.pdf

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?